SnowBall archive
[Index][Thread]
GE - Field releases in Hungary face delay
- To: genetics@gn.apc.org
- Subject: GE - Field releases in Hungary face delay
- From: groundup@aseed.antenna.nl (by way of genetics <genetics@gn.apc.org>)
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 21:01:48 +0100
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
- Resent-From: snowball@gen.free.de
- Resent-Message-ID: <"A-P7MB.A.3iD.GeuA3"@bakunix.free.de>
- Resent-Sender: snowball-request@gen.free.de
_______________________________________________
Monsanto Monitor
_________________________________________________
A temporary victory?
Monsanto, Novartis and AgrEvo Field Trials Face Delay in
Hungary
_________________________________________________
Vera Mora, of Hungary’s Environmental Partnership and the
ETK, sits on the newly established Genetechnology
Committee. In the first round of applications for
experimental release to be examined by the GC, five
dossiers were delayed until further data or analysis are
provided by the applicants. The applications were for
three varieties of corn, and two sugarbeet trials.
______________________________________________
I was two days late for the A SEED “Hunger in Genetic
Legoland” seminar in Freiburg. I should have liked to come
earlier, but the main reason I couldn’t was a meeting of
the Gene Technology Committee on Tuesday in Budapest.
The Hungarian Gene Technology Act passed by the
Parliament last Mach entered into force as the first
comprehensive legislation of genetice engineering in the
Central and Eastern European region at the beginning of
this year. One of the most important the provisions of this
regulation was to order the setup of the above mentioned
Gene Technology Committee. This multilateral expert
body’s principal task is to evaluate the permission requests
filed for GE applications, including the creation, release
and trade in GMOs. The committee consists of
representatives of the Aceademy of Scientists, various
ministries (Agriculture, Environment, Health, Finances,
etc.), health NGOs and environmental NGOs. Out of the 17
members four reprensent environmentalists, among them
I’m one of the lucky (?) ones.
Our committee’s third meeting took place on then 23rd of
March, but this was the first “real” one in the sense that
this was the first occasion we had to decide about actual
permission requests. It was clear to us long beforehand
that given our numbers, we NGO representatives won’t be
able to stop GMO applications, what we can achieve at
most is slowing down the process by asking more
questions, calling for more expert opinions. For this
meeting five permission documents came: two form
Monsanto, two from Novartis and one from AgrEvo (three
concerning corn, two sugar beets). It was obvious that
the documents were put together in a hurry, with
numerous spelling and translation mistakes.
In three cases, our task was easy: the documents didn’t
indicate either the site of release, nor the monitoring and
control measures the intended to take. In the two other
cases (Monstanto’s Roundup Ready corn and sugar beet)
the Committee put up many other additional questions,
such as:
whateffect will glyphosate (the active ingredient of
Roundup) treatment have on other organisms, such as
mosses and lichens?
willthe consumption glyphosate-treated crops have
any health effects (the data submitted only shown
resuts of experiments made with non-treated crops)?
whatmeasures will the company take in case of an
emergency (their answer in the original was: ”there is
no possibilty of an emergency case”)?
As a result, all five documents were sent back for further
data and clarification. As our next meeting will take place
on the 20th of April, I think it is hardly unlikely that they
will be able to come up with reasonable information,
therefore (alas for them!) a planting season is certainly
lost.
However, our committee doesn’t (unfortunately) have the
final say on things: it acts as an expert advisory body to
the Ministry of Agriculture, which still might overturn our
resolution. However unlikely I think it is, our Minister might
be well disappointed with our opinion: looking at recent
press reports, during his numerous travels, he mae
“preliminary agreements” with his US (!) and Australian
collegaues to offer Hungary as a ground to grow GM
seeds… this means the battle is by far not over yet.
I hope an important step in this process will by Professor
Pusztai’s public lecture in Budapest planned for the second
half of April this is probably the most important thing we
are busy with at the moment.
For more information, contact: Vera Mora
<move@drotposta.hu>
__________________________________________________________
Rounding Up Monsanto
A SEED Europe
P.O. Box 92066
1090 AB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
tel: +31-20-468 2616
fax: +31-20-468 2275
email: groundup@aseed.antenna.nl