SnowBall archive
[Index][Thread]
GE - More on NZ uprootings
- To: <genetics@gn.apc.org>
- Subject: GE - More on NZ uprootings
- From: genetics <genetics@gn.apc.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 16:39:16 +0000
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- Resent-From: snowball@gen.free.de
- Resent-Message-ID: <"emPLLB.A.6tF.uj_92"@bakunix.free.de>
- Resent-Sender: snowball-request@gen.free.de
> even more from New Zealands Wild Greens .
>. .
>
>In the early hours of Thursday 11th March, a dozen people jumped the
>fence at the Crop and Food Research Centre at Lincoln, just outside of
>Christchurch.
>
>Within minutes an experimental genetically modified potato crop was
>destroyed and a $200,000 research project was ruined. The experiment
>involved mixing the genes of potatoes with genetic material from toads
>and silkworms to make the potatoes rot resistant.
>
>The timing was perfect. Opposition to genetically modified food has been
>growing and the debate about Genetically modified food was one of the
>major political issues this week, with even the Prime Minister suddenly
>announcing she was in favour of labelling GM food the day after the
>government called labelling "costly and unworkable".
>
>Considering that this was the first major act of sabotage by
>environmental activists in this country for as long as most people can
>remember, the reaction to it was quite good.
>
>The most common reaction by environmental group leaders was an attitude
>of cautious support or "understanding" of the sabotage.
>
>The predictable exception was Greenpeace NZ. These corporate scum posing
>as environmental activists put out a media release condemning the
>attack, presumably on the grounds that a media stunt by a bunch of
>yuppies in silly costumes is a more effective way of attracting
>donations.
>
>Most of the media were quick to use the word "eco-terrorism" to describe
>the nonviolent act of uprooting some potatoes.
>
>The sabotage was claimed by a group called the Wild Greens who are the
>direct action youth branch of the green party.
>
>A spokesperson for the Wild Greens, Nandor Tanczos, spent last week
>doing a national speaking tour of universities explaining the philosophy
>of the Wild Greens. More info on thier beliefs and aims can be found on
>their website
>
>http://www.econation.org.nz/
>
>They support building a grassroots direct action movement against
>environmental destruction which sounds great, but the main problem I
>have is they are linked to the reformist Green Party and this shows in
>their policies promoting vague ideas about "green business" and "good
>government".
>
>Meanwhile security has been stepped up at Ruakura Agricultural Research
>Station (The biggest vivisection lab in the southern hemisphere) where
>genetically modified cows are being bred, and at other crop research
>labs around the country.
>