SnowBall archive
[Index][Thread]
GE - news mix 18th March
- To: <genetics@gn.apc.org>
- Subject: GE - news mix 18th March
- From: genetics <genetics@gn.apc.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 22:46:20 +0000
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
- Resent-From: snowball@gen.free.de
- Resent-Message-ID: <"55NjWB.A.YTH.zri82"@bakunix.free.de>
- Resent-Sender: snowball-request@gen.free.de
1) Consumer power rears its head to drive GM food off supermarket shelves
2) US sends Europe trade war warning on GMOs
3) Often people who grow trees for lumber or for Christmas trees...
4) Novartis Enters Biotech Race For Cereal Mkt
5) French environmentalists want longer gene crop ban March 16, 1999
6) Zeneca and Monsanto Announce Global Agreement for Touchdown On Roundup
Ready Crops
7) Restaurants must declare any GM food
==================================
PUBLICATION Agence France Presse English
DATE Thu 18 Mar 1999
SECTION/CATEGORY International News
BYLINE by Philip Pank
STORY LENGTH 585
1) Consumer power rears its head to drive GM food off supermarket shelves
LONDON, March 18 (AFP) - Hostility to genetically engineered food
reached a highpoint across Europe Wednesday when leading supermarket
chains bowed to consumer pressure and decided to chase "Frankenstein
food" from their shelves.
In Britain, Sainsbury's and Marks and Spencer supermarkets announced
that they would remove all genetically-modified (GM) ingredients from
their own-brand range.
The high street giants launched a Europe-wide consortium which also
grouped the French hypermarket retailer Carrefour, Delhaize of Belgium,
Migros in Switzerland, Effelunga in Italy and the Irish group
Superquinn.
The group pledged to eek out non-GM sources in farmers' fields and not
to mix these with known GM crops.
At present, genetically engineered produce is found in an estimated 60
percent of processed food.
The British government is due to clarify its policy on GM crops soon,
amid calls for a three-year moratorium on planting GM crops here. London
has recently tempered its wholehearted support for the produce.
Consumers in Britain and elsewhere have become alarmed at the potential
health hazards of eating food that has been concocted using genes from
other species.
Environmentalists fear that crops implanted with herbicide-resistant
genes will be sprayed with powerful chemicals that will decimate
surrounding plant and animal life.
They are also concerned that nature's ingenuity will create bionic bugs
capable of withstanding the chemicals used on new super crops.
"Our customers have indicated to us very clearly that they do not want
genetically-modified ingredients in their food and we are taking steps
to offer that guarantee," said a spokeswoman for Sainsbury's, Britain's
second biggest supermarket chain.
Britons are slowly waking to the benefits of eating healthy food.
The change follows a string of food scares here, including the "madcow"
panic sparked after the government admitted that consumers who ate
infected beef could contract a fatal brain-wasting disease, a deadly
outbreak of e-coli food poisoning and a spate of salmonella in eggs.
Sainsbury's environmental manager Alison Austin said that "by
establishing verified non-GM sources in the farmer's field and ensuring
segregation through the supply chain we will be GM free.
"We always wanted GM and standard crops to be separated and were
extremely disappointed when this did not happen with the US soya crop."
The supermarkets said that they would look towards Canada and Brazil for
supplies of natural soya.
Retailers complain that the giant US producers cannot guarantee that
their shipments are free of genetic engineering, because they mix beans
at source.
Imports of soya beans from the United States into Europe has emerged as
a political hot-potato amid a wider dispute between the two trading
blocks over import policy.
Three European countries, Italy, Austria and Luxembourg, have imposed
unilateral bans on US soya imports, despite European Union clearance.
Consumer groups insist that modified foodstuffs must be clearly labelled
as such, if indeed they are allowed to be sold at all.
Senior food campaigner at Friends of the Earth environmental lobby
group, Pete Riley, said that the British government should "ban GM
ingredients until tests on their potential health impacts have been
completed."
London has publicly welcomed a voluntary three-year suspension of GM
crop planting in Britain, a breathing space to better assess the impact
of GM crops on human health and the environment.
Science Minister Lord Sainsbury, whose family founded the supermarket
chain, said: "Obviously the prime requirement is safety and the impact
on the environment.
"If this voluntary arrangement gives even more time before commercial
planting, so there's more time to assess the environmental impact, that
has to be good."
Agence France Presse English
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2) US sends Europe trade war warning on GMOs
18/03/99
-------------------------
A senior US agriculture official has warned the EU that
disagreements over biotechnology could spark a global trade
war unless politicians agree internationally acceptable
regulations on genetically modified agricultural
commodities. Richard Rominger, the US deputy secretary of
agriculture told a conference in Brussels today that the EU
and the US must ensure that GMO food safety does not become
"the next trade battleground".
The comments will be interpreted as a warning from the US
that it will fight any regulatory regime which it sees as
discriminating against US produce. Although Mr Rominger's
speech was couched in diplomatic terms, it contained a clear
message that Europe's current regulatory regime was failing
to provide fair market access to US GM crops.
The US was "bending over backwards" to understand the
European situation, he said, but getting frustrated by the
EU's failure to apply its own rules. Examples of what the
US already considers trade barriers are the unilateral bans
imposed by Luxembourg and Austria on GM maize which in
theory has been approved for sale throughout the EU (ENDS
Daily 16 April 1998), and the slow progress of getting
approval for marketing of GM crops in the EU, under a 1990
directive which is currently being revised.
He claimed that the US had lost trade worth about US$200m
last year when it could not export GM maize to Spain and
Portugal because there was a delay in getting EU approval
for the three different strains. In private, US officials
say France deliberately blocked the GMO approvals in order
to thwart the US exports and sell more of its own maize.
The speech adds to rising concerns that different countries'
GMOs will be a major stumbling block at the next round of
WTO talks which will focus heavily on liberalising
international markets for agriculture. The widespread
acceptance of GMOs in the US means that between a quarter
and one-half of the US' production of maize, soya and cotton
is now GM.
On the other side of the argument, UK Socialist MEP David
Bowe said he was concerned that the US might use "aggressive
and bullying" tactics over the issue at the WTO talks. In a
speech given in his absence by his assistant, Mr Bowe said
that the US was "out of step" with most of the rest of the
world on GMOs. He said evidence for this was that the US
had been largely responsible for the recent collapse of
international negotiations on a biosafety protocol that
would have set rules for trading GMOs.
Beverley Thorpe (bthorpe@web.net)
Clean Production Action
5964 Avenue Notre Dame de Grace
Montreal, Que
Canada H4A 1N1
tel: +1 (514) 484 4207
fax: +1 (514) 484 2696
=========================
>From
<http://users.aol.com/queenbjan/beeprob.htm>http://users.aol.com/queenbjan/b
eeprob.htm
3) Often people who grow trees for lumber or for Christmas trees will use
herbicides to kill all other plants growing around the trees. This creates
an environment that is even more barren and hostile to the bees. Not only
do they not have hardwood trees, but they no longer have the blossoms from
wild berries and flowers. Some of the best nectar sources for the bees are
blackberries, gallberries, goldenrod, mustard, and other wild plants.
Without them the bees will starve. Jerry Cranmer, a beekeeper in southern
Georgia, has written a letter about this problem. Click here to read his
letter.
Bees aren't the only wildlife that suffer with the legal abuse of
herbicides. Many wild animals feed on berries and wild plants. I recall a
good friend living in the mountains of North Carolina who was very upset
about the decrease in the number of birds in the mountains. It was eerie to
him how quiet it was outdoors. His belief was that the Roundup being used
extensively around the Christmas tree farms was hurting the wildlife in the
area.
A letter dated February 2, 1997, by Jerry Cranmer (jcranmer@camden.tds.net)
We have been noticing a phenomenon in S Georgia, and we feel that it is
time to alert the community.
Several beekeepers in our association have documented large scale, (1000 +
acres), of planted pine forest in this region have been sprayed with
herbicides. The resultant effects have been devastating to the plants that
we honey producers depend on for our livelihood.
It may also very well be a harbinger of a greater consequence for our
ecosystem. The native shrubs like gallberry, ti ti,and palmetto are all
vertually destroyed in these forests. All that are left are the pine trees
and pine needles. The migratory birds , and native wildlife all must leave
these barren areas.
The culprits are the large lumber companies like Georgia Pacific and
Rayonier. They are believing the chemical Co. sales pitch , that this will
improve their profits.
If you have any questions or would like to see photos of the sprayed
forests contact the president of the SE Georgia beekeepers Association,
Bobby Rowell Rt. One Box 147 Nahunta,Ga. 31553
Jerry Cranmer jcranmer@camden.tds.net
===================================
[The Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition]
Dow Jones Newswires -- March 17, 1999
DJ INTERVIEW:
4) Novartis Enters Biotech Race For Cereal Mkt
By DANIEL BALINT-KURTI
LONDON -- Swiss multinational Novartis AG (Z. NOV) is planning to enter the
cereals market in a bid to boost sales of the company's gene-modified seed,
Wolfgang Samo, head of the Novartis Agribusiness Division, told Dow Jones
Newswires this week.
Developing cereal crops would give Novartis access to a vast market. The
value of the world wheat market alone for biotechnology companies was put
by one industry analyst at around $70 billion.
Research is underway to engineer a variety of barley which would be easier
to malt, said Samo. He said the market for such 'output traits', qualities
designed to benefit the processor or consumer of the crop, is even larger
than the market for crops engineered to resist weeds and insects.
"Input traits are just the door openers for biotech. Output traits (will)
determine the market - I think it is unlimited," said Samo.
The acquisition of French grain seed company C.C. Benoist S.A. last year,
the second purchase of such a company by Novartis, should help Novartis to
eventually penetrate the wheat market. Although Novartis is not currently
running any research projects on wheat, a spokesman said developing a
herbicide-resistant wheat seed is a long-term aim for the company.
Sales of herbicide resistant seeds and their compatible pesticides are
already big business for German biotechnology firm AgrEvo GmbH and Monsanto
Corp (MTC). Sales of Monsanto soybeans engineered for resistance to its own
brand of herbicide, Roundup, have boomed in the U.S. over the last year.
By delaying the start-up of research projects into wheat, Novartis risks
falling behind other biotechnology companies. A spokesman for Monsanto,
which sources say has made the most progress of all biotechnology firms
towards genetically modifying wheat, said it aims to have its wheat on the
market within the next five to seven years.
"We are not really a big wheat seeds company," said Samo. "We will first
get to know the market better before embarking on big GMO (genetically
modified organism) projects."
Samo said research is still being conducted into the herbicide - called a
protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitor, or PPO - that would eventually work
together with Novartis herbicide-resistant crops.
He said Novartis PPO-resistant corn, which would be marketed in conjunction
with PPO, should be on the market by 2003. The company already sells corn
seeds genetically modified to produce bacillus thuringiensis, an
insect-killing bacteria.
"We have the chemical pesticide in development. It is not yet fully
developed," Samo said.
A research manager at the company has said the new Acuron gene, which makes
plants resistant to PPO, could eventually be applied to wheat, soybeans and
rice. According to Samo, Novartis genetically modified wheat is "quite a
long way down the line".
Novartis will be aided in marketing corn by its joint venture with
U.S.-based Land O' Lakes Inc., which is, according to Samo, among the
largest cooperatives of corn producers in the U.S.
Engineering new genetically modified varieties of rice is not part of
Novartis' immediate plans, Samo said. He added that Novartis donated the
right to use its Bt gene in rice to the International Rice Research
Institute in the Philippines.
Using the Bt gene, the IRRI is trying to develop a rice resistant to the
plant hopper, an insect which damages rice crops in much of southeast Asia.
-By Daniel Balint-Kurti 44-171-832-9561;
daniel.balint-kurti@dowjones.com
Copyright © 1999 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
===========================
5) French environmentalists want longer gene crop ban March 16, 1999
PARIS, Reuters [WS] via NewsEdge Corporation : French environmental groups,
spurred on by talk of a possible freeze on gene-crops in Britain, on Monday
called for a longer, broader moratorium in France so wider tests could be
carried out. ``This is a sign of encouragement which should push the French
government to reconsider the risks from gene modified foods,'' said
campaigner Etienne Vernet at Ecoropa. ``We want a moratorium on all types
of GM food for three to five years so we can do more tests. If Britain did
impose a three year freeze, France should do the same thing.''
Greenpeace France Director Bruno Rebelle also backed a freeze on GM crops
until at least 2002 and more rigorous tests. France imposed a two-year
freeze on genetically engineered oilseed varieties last July after
concerns the modifications could be transmitted to other crops.
====================================
6) Zeneca and Monsanto Announce Global Agreement for Touchdown On Roundup
Ready Crops
Thursday March 18, 8:56 am Eastern Time
Company Press Release
Zeneca and Monsanto Announce Global
Agreement for Touchdown On Roundup
Ready Crops
WILMINGTON, Del.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 18, 1999--Zeneca
Agrochemicals and Monsanto Company today announced a long term
license agreement on undisclosed terms under which Zeneca will test,
develop and register Touchdown® herbicide
products for use on or over the top of Roundup Ready® soybeans, corn and
cotton in the United States.
Under the agreement, Zeneca, once it has obtained U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency registration, will sell
Touchdown herbicide for application on or over the top of these crops.
Additionally, Monsanto and Zeneca have agreed to negotiate in good faith
access to additional Roundup Ready crops in
the United States and to all Roundup Ready crops globally, as they are
commercialized. Negotiations for commercial
access after the second commercial season will occur on a country and crop
basis.
Under this agreement, Zeneca would test, develop and register its products
while negotiations are taking place.
As a part of the agreement, Zeneca, Monsanto and Pioneer Hi-Bred
International Inc. have agreed to dismiss the
lawsuits they have pending against each other in Delaware and Missouri.
These relate to the use of Touchdown over
Roundup Ready crops and related Monsanto patents, and to Monsanto's
marketing practices.
Monsanto's Roundup and Zeneca's Touchdown will compete with each other in
the agricultural weed control market.
Zeneca Agrochemicals is the crop protection and plant science business of
the Zeneca Group. Zeneca Group PLC
(NYSE:ZEN - news) is a $9.1 billion international bioscience company which
provides products and services to
improve human health, nutrition and the quality of life.
The group, which employs some 32,000 people world-wide, is engaged in the
research, development, manufacture and
marketing of ethical (prescription) pharmaceuticals, agricultural and
specialty chemicals products and the supply of
healthcare services.
As a life sciences company, Monsanto Company (NYSE:MTC - news) is committed
to finding solutions to the
growing global needs for food and health by sharing common forms of science
and technology among agriculture,
nutrition and health. The company's 30,000 employees worldwide make and
market high-value agricultural products,
pharmaceuticals and food ingredients.
NOTE TO EDITORS: Roundup and Roundup Ready are trademarks of Monsanto
Company. Touchdown is a
trademark of Zeneca Limited.
==================================
7) Restaurants must declare any GM food
The Daily Telegraph London
RESTAURANTS and cafes will be forced to tell their
customers about any genetically modified ingredients
contained in their food under measures to be announced by the
Government today.
It is expected that declarations will have to be made on menus. Bakers and
delicatessens will also
have to comply with the new labelling controls, which will exceed current
European Union
requirements.
At present EU labelling regulations lay down that all foods sold in shops
and supermarkets must
be clearly marked if they contain more than two per cent of GM ingredients.
The move follows an announcement this week that Marks & Spencer is to ban
all genetically
modified food from its shelves.
Sainsbury's said yesterday that it is to ban genetically modified
ingredients from its own-brand
foods and that it has joined a consortium to ensure supplies of non-GM
ingredients in future.
Last night [ Monsanto ] , the leading company in GM crop research and
development, said it could
not confirm a report from Greenpeace that it had been forced to withdraw
applications to release
genetically modified soya for commercial production in Brazil after
protests from
environmentalists and consumer groups.
The GM soya is immune to Roundup, one of the world's most widely used
weedkillers, allowing
farmers to control the weeds easily without damaging their crops.
The company was also forced to defend the use of BST, a synthetically
reproduced cattle
hormone which is injected into cows to make them produce more milk, after
a leading British
scientist claimed that the drug caused too many animal health problems.
This product, developed by Monsanto, is used in 50 countries including the
United States, but is
banned in the EU under a moratorium which ends in December.
Prof Donald Broom, who led an independent EU veterinary investigation into
BST, which
concluded that the drug should remain banned because claims for its safety
were flawed, said:
"There is too much mastitis, leg disorders, reproductive disorders and
injection site problems -
and this is not a medicine, this is a substance that doesn't have to be
used, and so we think it
shouldn't be used."
It was also claimed that separate research suggested that a hormone called
IGF-1, which is linked
to some human cancers, could be increased in milk produced with the aid of
BST. Monsanto
claims that IGF-1 is not increased by using BST.
Prof Broom from Cambridge University's veterinary school, said: "They got
it wrong."
Monsanto said: "BST has repeatedly been proved safe for people and
animals. The human safety
has been confirmed by over 50 countries throughout the world.
"Less than six weeks ago the US Food and Drug Administration reaffirmed
the product as safe
for humans. The European Union's Committee on Veterinary Medicinal
Products and the World
Health Organisation's Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives have also
ruled that the product
is safe for humans."
The company said BST was now the fastest selling animal health product on
earth.
(Copyright 1999 (c) The Telegraph plc, London)
_____via IntellX_____