Re: Recalling GMOs, Labelling and safety
- To: "Genfree list" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,"Rick Roush" <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Recalling GMOs, Labelling and safety
- From: "Heine J. Deelstra" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 22:42:57 +0200
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
- Resent-From: email@example.com
Tuesday 18 May 1999 Dr. Roush wrote:
>>I've learnt recently that the coding sequence inserted is not
>>exactly the very same as the one in the natural Bt (i've not
>>put quotes around natural !).
>Herve: The protein produced is exactly the same as by the bacteria;
>is, the amino acid sequence is exactly the same. In any case, again
>cotton, there is no Bt or DNA in the oil, nor any difference in the
>composition of the oil.
I'm sorry but that is not completely correct:
The gene expressed in corn is a truncated* version of the Bacillus
thuringiensis toxin and the smallest fragment that still possesses
toxicity to insects. (Reference: M. Vaeck et al. Nature 328, 33-37,
* Truncated at both (5'&3') ends.