GENTECH archive
[Index][Thread]
Re: Dr. Arpad Pusztai, archive 731
- To: "Rick Roush" <rroush@waite.adelaide.edu.au>
- Subject: Re: Dr. Arpad Pusztai, archive 731
- From: "Clive Elwell" <jevans@thenet.co.nz>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 18:17:15 +1300
- Cc: <gentech@gen.free.de>
- Content-Type: multipart/alternative;boundary="----=_NextPart_000_049F_01BE5AA1.BEF34100"
- Resent-From: gentech@gen.free.de
- Resent-Message-ID: <"fD14iD.A.JdB.uBly2"@bakunix.free.de>
- Resent-Sender: gentech-request@gen.free.de
I believe your point is now being covered
by my postings under the heading "GE]: Re: GM food and the
media"
Clive
No, Clive, I believe that you are incorrect on the facts here. I went
back to my notes from emails last August to check my recollections (see
example below). Without doubt, Dr Pusztai said then that the lectin was
harmful. The problem was apparently that he had said that the GE potatoes were
at fault, when in fact he had inadvertantly looked at data in which the lectin
was mixed into the food.
This example does not undermine the assessment
process, both because BOTH transgenic and mixing experiments showed a problem,
and because the current assessment process looks at the transgenic product
anyway, at least for the cases of insect resistant plants with which I am
familiar.
Rick
> Surely Dr Pusztai's findings showed
that this lectin becomes harmful when
>it is
>transferred by GM
into the potato. This was shown in feeding trials with
>rats which
suffered severe organ damage, even brain damage - a finding that
>has
now been confirmed by a senior pathologist. However, the lectin is
NOT
>harmful when mixed with normal potato and fed to the rats. This
indicates
>that
>it is the MODIFICATION ITSELF which is the
problem, which is why this
>research
>is so explosive as it
undermines the whole basis on which GM foods have been
>assessed to
date.
>Whether this particular lectin is in use or not seems to me to
be
>immaterial, as far as what Dr Pusztai's research points
to.
>
>Clive Elwell
As the
BBC called it
/bigger>/bigger>/fontfamily>BBC
Wednesday, August 12, 1998 Published at 15:42 GMT 16:42 UK
Genetics
scientist suspended
Dr Arpad Pusztai will now retire
BBC Science
Correspondent James Wilkinson reports
The scientist at the
centre of
controversial claims over the risks of eating
genetically-modified (GM)
food has been suspended.
Dr Arpad Pusztai claimed research on rats fed
with genetically
modified potatoes had suffered immune damage.
He
had gone on the ITV World In Action programme to raise questions
about the
safety of GM food in the human diet on the basis of the
study.
But
his employers, the Rowett Research Institute in Aberdeen, said
the
scientist had got into a "muddle" and had provided
misleading
information.
Professor Phillip James, Director of the
Aberdeen-based Rowett
Research Institute, said Dr Arpad Pusztai had been
interpreting the
wrong data.
"Dr Arpad Pusztai had
got
himself, under the intense pressure of media interest and huge
complex
experiments, into a state where he actually thought he was looking
at
the transgenic study when he was not."
Professor James
described the mistake as tragic. "He went too fast,
too
early."
Dr Arpad Pusztai will now retire. In a statement, the
Rowett said he
would not in future have responsibility for institute, UK or
European
studies into GM food./bigger>/bigger>/fontfamily>