GENTECH archive
[Index][Thread]
"Top" British scientist on GM food
- To: Ban-GEF@lists.txinfinet.com, GENTECH@ping.de
- Subject: "Top" British scientist on GM food
- From: MichaelP <papadop@PEAK.ORG>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 16:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- Delivered-To: GENTECH@ping.de
- Resent-From: gentech@data.free.de
- Resent-Message-ID: <"me7G3D.A.GrF.b7M11"@data.free.de>
- Resent-Sender: gentech-request@data.free.de
"many types of food eaten today would not exist without changes introduced
by humans"
This remark bears looking at, doesn't it? Couldn't he have acknowledged
the efforts of the birds and the bees? or of other insects? And surely
there is a huge difference between selective breeding - which seems (to
me) to be grounded largely on systematic observation - and GM. The
selective breeder of strawberries is not very likely to pick out plants
which contain fish genes, is she ?
MichaelP
===============================================
Top British scientist backs genetically made food
_________________________________________________________________
LONDON, Aug 14 (Reuters) - A leading British scientist on Friday
dismissed fears over genetically modified food as irrational and said
engineering new crops was no different from the selective breeding
farmers had carried out for centuries.
Oxford University professor Richard Dawkins, an award-winning
science author, said in a letter to the Independent newspaper that
many types of food eaten today would not exist without changes
introduced by humans.
A fierce debate is raging in Britain over the merits of
genetically modified (GM) crops.
Protesters have dug up a number of fields testing GM plants,
causing extensive damage, and in June heir to the throne Prince
Charles accused scientists of playing God by genetically engineering
food.
``The other thing you can say to Prince Charles is that, if you
look at a maize cob, it is hugely different from a wild maize cob and
that has been achieved not by introducing foreign genes but by
artificially selecting genes,'' Dawkins wrote.
``When one uses rhetoric like 'Frankenstein's plants', you could
call a maize cob a Frankenstein plant, but every one is quite happy to
eat maize cobs.''
He added: ``There's a general feeling that these foods are almost
radioactive. The reaction has been as if people believe genetically
modified plants are poisonous, or they give you cancer or they degrade
your immune system. Well anything can do that.''
Genetic engineering can introduce genes from one species of plant
or animal into the genetic make-up of another species of crop plant,
but ``the fact that you are importing them from another species does
not inherently make it bad or good,'' Dawkins said.
_________________________________________________________________
Copyright © 1998 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication
or redistribution of Reuters Limited content, including by framing or
similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written
consent of Reuters Limited. Reuters Limited shall not be liable for
any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in
reliance thereon.
_________________________________________________________________
Back to table of contents