GENTECH archive 8.96-97
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Opinions please
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Peter M. Ligotti)
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 16:37:09 -0700
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Can I gather some opinions ??
>Is this genetic engineering (GE) technology,
>like many other technologies,
>able to be used in both "good" and "bad" ways ??
We can only assess good and bad applications through
rigorous long-term testing. The fruit of these actions cannot
be known until long-term test results are in.
>Or is it inherantly
It is dangerous to alter the DNA within the food supply and then to
release those foods unlabeled and untested onto the population.
It is dangerous to release these artificially mutated plants
into our delicate ecosystem. Genetically engineered production agents
are also dangerous.
>I can see where the argument that it goes against nature
>comes from and that it is therefore immoral perhaps -
>but does that make it dangerous ??
Yes. Absolutely. Extremely dangerous.
>The most acceptable example of GE, I think, is the production
>of insulin for diabetics from yeast GE'ed to produce Human insulin.
Perhaps. But it is ridiculous to make analogies between drugs
and health applications for specific sicknesses and the
DNA-alteration of the entire global food supply. What is ridiculous
is to think in this manner....
1. Some genetically-engineered drugs have done some good
2. It is OK to genetically engineer the global food
supply, release the foods unlabeled and untested....
3. Later we will find out that there was maybe some good as well
as bad results. Since unintended effects will be random and
unpredictable, they will definitely be negative side effects.
It is unlikely that accidental unintended side effects
created by technicians in the lab will bring a positive result
for the individual or the environment.
4. Essentially, basically, bottom-line, this is doing experiments
directly on the human population. This is doing experiments
directly on our delicate ecosystem at a most powerful and
subtle level. Genetic errors, mistakes and catastrophes will
be irreversible at least in part because the altered DNA will
continue on and effects will be propagated throughout the ecosystem.
Genetic errors will be locked into the DNA of living organisms
and perpetuate themselves throughout the ecosystem and to
future generations. However, through this irresponsible activity,
there may be no future generations. Sickness and chaos may
be what we will leave to future generations with this technology.
>This insulin is much cheaper to produce and is more easily
>purified from bacteria than it is from the pig and cows
>that used to be the major source of pig/cow (not human)
>insulin for use by diabetics. 90% of insulin in
>Australia is now produced by GE'ed organisms. What do you think ?
Drugs are a completely different thing. People choose to take
GE or some other type of insulin if they have a sickness --
diabetes. This is a completely different issue than altering the
DNA in the global food supply. Drugs are for the sick. They are
feeding these foods to the (so far) healthy population.
We have a saying "If it isn't broke, don't fix it."
Or, in other words, "Don't screw around with our food."
>Or do I just not "get it" ?????
I hope you will "get it" now.