GENTECH archive 8.96-97
Re: Misc. products and BOWEN
- To: Dave Rietz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: Misc. products and BOWEN
- From: Betty Martini <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 20:24:46 -0500 (EST)
- cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, Ban-GEF@lists.txinfinet.com, MCS-CI@mail1.bellglobal.com
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <email@example.com>
Dear Dave: Thanks so much for posting these products that are genetically
engineered. Is nothing safe anymore. I wonder who checked these things
out, and with Coke being genetically engineered, I wonder does this have
to do with the fact NutraSweet is in it or because of other genetically
P.S. I knew about Dr. Bowen's fact sheet because I posted it. I'm going
to post this to the gene lists who would probably like to have this
itemization. And letting them know of the cartoon. I think we've got hte
news around the world now when a cartoon, syndicated, comes out with a man
saying he invented a new artificial sewetener/poison for attracting and
killing houseflies, and calling it NutraSwat. Since I was told that
NutraSweet was spraying their crops with the product, the point is
obviously made that NutraSweet is a great pesticide!
To get more information on aspartame, email firstname.lastname@example.org as follows:
Subject: sendme help
The subject line must be typed exactly like the above line.
Betty Martini 1. Take the 60-day No-Aspartame test
Mission Possible and send us your case history.
5950-H State Bridge Rd 2. Tell your doctor and your friends.
Suite 215 3. Return Aspar-Poisoned foods to the store.
Duluth GA 30155 USA (Nutrasweet(tm), Equal(tm), Spoonful(tm), etc)
Visit http://www.dorway.com with links to more than 25 other Web Sites
We are dedicated to the proposition that we will not be satisfied until death
and disability are no longer considered an acceptable cost of business.
On Mon, 10 Feb 1997, Dave Rietz wrote:
> I ran across this bit at:
> From: Maraya (I.D.# 20775)
> Subject: Genetically Engineered Foods: Companies, Brand Names and Foods
> Date: November 09, 1996 at 23:34 GMT
> Genetically Engineered Foods: Companies, Brand Names and Foods
> COMPANIES INVOLVED IN GENETIC ENGINEERING
> DNA Plant Tech.
> Northrup King
> Petro Seed
> Plant Genetic Systems
> Research Seeds
> Rhone Merieux
> Rhone Poulenc
> Cornell University is involved
> Hawaii University is involved
> BRAND NAME PRODUCTS WHICH MAY BE (OR ARE) GENETICALLY ENGINEERED OR CONTAIN
> GENETICALLY ENGINEERED INGREDIENTS
> BT corn
> Coca Cola
> Fleishmanns margarine
> Green Giant Harvest Burgers
> Karo Corn Syrup
> Kraft Salad Dressings
> McDonalds French Fries
> Nestle Crunch
> Quaker Oats corn meal
> Roundup Ready Soybeans
> Similac Infant Formula
> FOODS WHICH MAY BE GENETICALLY ENGINEERED OR CONTAIN GENETICALLY ENGINEERED
> Amylase is used in making bread, flour, whole wheat flour, cereals, starch,
> glucose syrup, cider, wine, beer etc.
> Baking powder - additives in processing
> Bread - soy in
> Canola Oil
> Catalase is used in making soft drinks, egg albumen, liquid whey
> Cereals - soy in
> Chymosin (rennet)
> Corn Products
> Corn Starch
> Corn Syrup
> Food Supplements - yeast in
> Fruit juices may be processed with genetically engineered products
> Glucose Syrup
> Ice Cream - soy in etc.
> Pasta - soy in
> Soft Drinks - in the processing or corn syrup
> Soy Products like soy sauce, burgers, frankfurters, powders etc.
> Sugar - in the processing
> GENETICALLY ENGINEERED PRODUCE BEING FIELD TESTED (Not on the market yet)
> Creeping Bentgrass
> Sugar Cane
> Sweet Gum
> Then... on:
> From: Maraya (I.D.# 20775)
> Subject: More on Aspartame - a Doctor Speaks Out
> Date: December 01, 1996 at 17:51 GMT
> This was posted on the food science news group.
> STATEMENT TO THE FDA ON FOOD LABELING -
> JAMES D. BOWEN, MD
> 3118 S Logan Ste.3, Lansing, MI 48910
> My statement for the public record regarding food labeling and the
> aspartame issue is serious if not somewhat facetious at times. The reason
> for this is because I have found little evidence of honesty, integrity or
> stability on the part of Food & Drug Administration officials regarding the
> aspartame issue, since its approval in 1981. This attitude is largely
> shared by the general public. I come in contact with approximately two new
> people each week who are now being or who have in the past been poisoned by
> All of them share the same reactions that it is not worth writing to the
> FDA or NutraSweet, because you and your agency have run amuck and are no
> longer a valid public benefactor.
> The recent revelations about the problems surrounding generic drug
> approvals are compelling evidence of what happens when an agency considered
> itself above the law in dealing with these matters. In my opinion, this
> has resulted in the mass poisoning of the American public as well as
> seventy-plus countries in the rest of the world. Watching FDA officials
> walk through the "revolving door" and be further rewarded by being promoted
> to other positions of high public responsibility is clear evidence of a
> government out of control.
> For this reason, I am opposed to labeling aspartame content of food and
> drinks. To do so would imply that the government is taking some sort of
> responsible action...when the only responsible action would be to
> immediately take aspartame off the market, fully disclose its toxicities,
> offer full compensation to the injured, public and criminally prosecute
> anyone who participated in the fraudulent placement of aspartame on the
> That includes those who work so diligently to keep in on the market as
> Further, to label the purported aspartame content of a product would cover
> a number of toxic flaws in the product and its allowable daily intake (ADI)
> as follows:
> 1. That the amount stated on the label was accurate and factual rather
> than theoretical. Aspartame breaks down relatively quickly in solution.
> Given the well established modus operandi of the manufacturer, there is no
> concern given the ultimate consumer. And cover-ups seem to be a part of
> the routine of doing business. The public should be well advised that the
> amounts really used in liquid products are relatively greater than those
> stated to accomplish a relative compensation for the loss of product
> sweetness occurring during storage in solution.
> 2. That the ADI presently allowed is 50% greater than that expected to
> cause a reversal of the phenylalnine/tyrosine ratios in the human brain.
> This has profoundly bad implications for the human being, including
> dopamine and serotonin synthesis inhibition, causing depression, appetite
> changes, mental inability's, increased susceptibility to seizures and a
> host of neurohormonal problems.
> 3. Every known metabolite of aspartame is of marked or questionable
> toxicity and patently unsafe for human use. Methyl alcohol is metabolized
> to nascent formaldehyde in the eye, nervous system and other metabolically
> active organs. It immediately attacks and denatures the tissue structure
> proteins in which is metabolized to nascent formaldehyde. This stimulates
> specific organ and subcellular autoimmunity which seems to be a
> preponderant source of the bad experiences reported by NutraSweet victims.
> Aspartic Acid is a neuroexcitotoxic present in damaging amounts, it own
> right, at the ADI for aspartame. Simple logic tells one that it will
> vastly increase the metabolism of methyl alcohol to formaldehyde attach
> there. This corresponds well with the symptomalogies often experienced,
> such as Lou Gehrig's Disease (ALS), bulbar palsies, neurohormonal
> disorders, diketopiperazine issue remains totally unresolved and dangerous.
> The amino acids that are released by hydrolysis, form eimers and isomers
> that are either not sufficiently studied, or which are known substrates in
> undesirable pathological states such as Alzheimer's disease. 4. There is
> the issue of the approval of aspartame for market, which has violated every
> principle of responsible science and responsible government.
> Everyone responsible for this hearing should at least completely review the
> approval process and the comments of the participants and observers who
> have so excellently elucidated all the malfeasance for the public record,
> such as Dr. Adrian Gross and many, many others (all on the public record). In
> light of the above 4 points, I highly recommend that you deny in every way
> possible any subterfuge of respectability that the aspartame people have
> enshrouded themselves and their product within hopes of quickly denying its
> access to the worldwide marketplace. I write this, not believing that it
> will do the slightest bit of good in the sense of affecting the labeling
> issue per se, but that instead, it might reach some honest, concerned,
> individuals in the process.
> The first is probably news, but you have probable seen the last one,
> David O. Rietz (ETCS USN Retired '76)
> ***** http://www.dorway.com *****
> aspartame=death! (AKA: Equal, Nutrasweet, ???)
> DO check out this information on the poison aspartame