7-Business: Cotton farmers sue Monsanto, others, for crop loss
- To: GENET-news <GENETemail@example.com>
- Subject: 7-Business: Cotton farmers sue Monsanto, others, for crop loss
- From: GENET <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:30:33 +0100
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
- List-Help: <mailto:email@example.com?subject=help>
- List-Post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Old-Return-Path: <email@example.com>
- Organization: GENET
- Resent-From: firstname.lastname@example.org
------------------------------- GENET-news -------------------------------
TITLE: Cotton Farmers Sue Monsanto, Others, for Crop Loss
SOURCE: Reuters, by Carey Gillam
DATE: 27 Feb 2006
------------------ archive: http://www.genet-info.org/ ------------------
Cotton Farmers Sue Monsanto, Others, for Crop Loss
KANSAS CITY - More than 90 Texas cotton farmers have sued Monsanto Co
and two affiliated companies, claiming they suffered widespread crop
losses because Monsanto failed to warn them of a defect in its
genetically altered cotton product.
The lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Marshall, Texas, seeks
an injunction against what it calls a "longstanding campaign of
deception," and asks the court to award both actual and punitive damages.
In addition to Monsanto, the suit names Delta & Pine Land Co and Bayer
CropScience LP, producers and retailers of Monsanto's biotech cotton. A
Delta & Pine Land spokeswoman said the company had no comment and no one
for Bayer, a unit of Bayer AG, returned phone calls seeking comment.
Monsanto, which denies the allegations, wants the complaints removed
from the court system and handled through arbitration. About half of the
farmers agreed this week to enter into arbitration, but others have not.
A hearing on the matter is scheduled for Monday in Austin.
The farmers' essential claim is that Monsanto's "Roundup Ready" cotton
did not tolerate applications of Monsanto's Roundup weed killer as it
has been genetically altered to do.
The farmers claim there is evidence that the promoter gene inserted into
the cotton seeds in the genetic modification process does not work as
designed in extreme high heat and drought conditions, allowing herbicide
to eat into plant tissue, leading to boll deformity, shedding and
The plaintiffs claim Monsanto knew this but did not disclose it so the
farmers would continue to buy and use Monsanto's Roundup herbicide.
"We feel like Monsanto's been lying to us all along," said B B Krenek, a
Wharton, Texas cotton consultant who is working with a number of
Monsanto spokesman Andrew Berchet said there is no evidence that
anything other than the weather is to blame for the technology that
caused the crop losses.
"As far as we can tell this is weather related. The month of June was
one of the driest and hottest in more than a century," said Berchet. "We
don't see evidence that this is related to our product."
But farmer Alan Stasney said he has evidence in his fields. A strip of
cotton four rows across and 3,000 feet long that inadvertently was not
treated with Roundup yielded 1,051 pounds of lint per acre at harvest,
while on either side of those rows, cotton that was treated with Roundup
yielded only 675 pounds per acre.
Stasney said the lost yield cost him more than $250,000 in sales and
forced him to refinance his farm.
"It is just a real sad situation," said Stasney. "There are a lot of
people in a world of hurt because of that."
European NGO Network on Genetic Engineering
Hartmut MEYER (Mr)
In den Steinäckern 13
D - 38116 Braunschweig
GENET-news mailing list