GENET archive

[Index][Thread]

2-Plants: Indian GM cotton is 'inadequate'; enquiry demanded



-------------------------------- GENET-news -------------------------------

TITLE:  Indian GM cotton is 'inadequate'; enquiry demanded
SOURCE: SciDev.Net, UK, by T. V. Padma
        http://www.scidev.net/News/index.cfm?
fuseaction=readNews&itemid=2275&language=1
DATE:   5 Aug 2005

------------------- archive: http://www.genet-info.org/ -------------------


*.........................................................................*
please download the study at:
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/jul252005/contents.htm
Temporal and intra-plant variability of Cry1Ac expression in Bt-cotton
and its influence on the survival of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa
armigera (Hübner) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera)
K. R. Kranthi, S. Naidu, C. S. Dhawad, A. Tatwawadi, K. Mate, E. Patil,
A. A. Bharose, G. T. Behere, R. M. Wadaskar and S. Kranthi
Current Science Vol. 89 No. 2 25 July 2005
*.........................................................................*


Indian GM cotton is 'inadequate'; enquiry demanded

[NEW DELHI] A study has found that Indian varieties of cotton that have
been genetically modified to resist an important insect pest are "inadequate".

The findings back farmers' claims that the pest, known as the bollworm,
is able to survive on Bt cotton varieties, modified to resist it.

Prompted by the study, the president of an agricultural lobby group in
India is demanding an enquiry into whether the government continued to
release the "inadequate" varieties, despite knowing their shortcomings.

The researchers, who published their findings in the Indian journal
Current Science last week (25 July), say farmers may have to be prepared
to use additional insecticide in the later stages of growing the crop.

Bt cotton is genetically modified to produce a toxin lethal to bollworms,
which cause an estimated US$1 billion worth of damage in India each year.
It is patented and sold by the US firm Monsanto.

In Australia, China, Indonesia, and South Africa farmers grow Monsanto's
Bt cotton as it is sold by the company. In India however, under a license
from Monsanto, the Bt cotton is repeatedly crossed with Indian varieties
to adapt it to the country's wide range of growing conditions.

The Indian government cleared the first three hybrid cotton varieties for
commercial cultivation in 2002. More were cleared for planting in
subsequent years.

In 2003, scientists from the Indian Central Institute for Cotton Research
(CICR) tested eight commercially grown hybrids. They found that some
hybrids produced up to seven times as much toxin as others. In addition,
differing amounts of toxin were found in different parts of individual plants.

Generally, the ovaries of the flowers and the rinds of the cotton bolls,
which are favoured by the bollworm, contained the least amount of toxin,
while leaves contained the highest levels. The amount of toxin declined
progressively as the plants grew, and dropped below effective levels 100
days after the seeds were sown.

The toxin levels in the boll rind and flowers are "clearly inadequate" to
fully protect the fruiting parts of the plant against the bollworm, the
scientists report.

They say the findings help to explain complaints from Indian farmers that
bollworms can survive on Bt cotton plants.

Several non-government organisations, including Greenpeace, the Dehli-based

Gene Campaign and the Rural Foundation for Science, Technology and
Environment, have reported instances of farmers complaining of Bt crop
failure, but these were dismissed by the government and scientists as
unsubstantiated.

On Wednesday (3 August) Suman Sahai, the president of Gene Campaign,
wrote to the secretary of India's Ministry of Environment and Forests
demanding an enquiry into whether the government released more Bt cotton
hybrids for commercial cultivation despite knowing the early trends of
CICR findings.

Already in 2003, the CICR filed a report to the Genetic Engineering
Approval Committee, a body of the environment ministry, indicating that
the levels of toxin in Indian Bt cotton might be insufficient to control
the pest.

In her letter to the ministry, Sahai says the approval committee violated
India's 1986 Environment Protection Act by not making CICR's early
findings public.

The committee's website provides access to the 2002-2003 and 2004-2005
CICR reports, but not to the 2003-2004 report which, according to Sahai,
would have contained its preliminary results on Indian Bt cotton.

Sahai has sent copies of her letter to the Indian prime minister and the
minister for the environment. Neither has yet responded.

The secretary of the environment ministry told SciDev.Net the ministry
has not yet received Sahai's letter.


Reference: Current Science 89, 291 (2005)




--


GENET
European NGO Network on Genetic Engineering

Hartmut MEYER (Mr)
In den Steinäckern 13
D - 38116 Braunschweig
Germany

P: +49-531-5168746
F: +49-531-5168747
M: +49-162-1054755
E: coordination(*)genet-info.org
W: <http://www.genet-info.org>



-----------------------------
   GENET-news mailing list
-----------------------------