3-Food: International protests build against GE food
- To: GENET-news <GENETemail@example.com>
- Subject: 3-Food: International protests build against GE food
- From: GENET <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:03:50 +0200
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- Reply-To: email@example.com
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
genet-news mailing list
-------------------------------- GENET-news --------------------------------
TITLE: Protests build against genetically modified food
SOURCE: IPS, UK
DATE: Mar 25, 2003
------------------ archive: http://www.gene.ch/genet.html ------------------
Protests build against genetically modified food
LONDON (IPS) - Protests were held around the world March 15 against
genetically modified foods on World Consumer Rights Day.
Protest meetings were held by about 250 consumer organizations under the
wing of the London-based Consumers International. Meetings reportedly
were held in many cities across Europe, Africa and Asia.
In Jamaica, Consumers International launched a study into the prevalence
of GM foods in the local markets, and will lobby for a regulatory
framework to protect consumers. In Vietnam, events were held in 18
different provinces aimed at raising awareness around the issue of
genetically modified (GM) foods.
Much of the protest was aimed at the U.S. company Monsanto. That is the
company developing more than 90 per cent of GM foods.
Most GM food is being grown in the United States and Argentina, and to a
smaller extent in Canada and China. These four countries produce about 99
per cent of the world's GM food.
"But public concern outside of these countries, in Europe, India and
other places seems greater than in the U.S. or in Argentina," said Julian
Edwards, director-general of Consumers International.
That is at least partly because GM products are increasingly being grown
in many other countries. There are also fears around the world over new
products. "Monsanto has already developed a form of genetically modified
wheat, and is trying to gauge the right moment to release it in the
market," Mr. Edwards said.
About a third of the maize grown in the U.S. is reported to be
genetically modified. Much of the GM crop was intended as animal feed,
but there are increasing signs these foods are being developed for human
consumption. The use of GM foods in the U.S. is already widespread,
though the proportion of an average diet that it takes up is not very high.
In Argentina, some of the GM soy crop meant for animal feed has been
diverted for human consumption, Mr. Edwards said.
There is little evidence so far of damage to health caused by GM foods.
But that may not by itself be reason to feel reassured. "When the first
pesticides were introduced in the thirties, we were all told by
scientists that they were safe," Mr. Edwards said. "Their effects began
to surface 30 years later, and many of them are now banned."
There are indications already of allergies from GM foods if proper pre-
marketing tests are not carried out, Mr. Edwards said. "GM crops are
something which nature would not do. There will have to be questions over
something which challenges natural development."
Consumers International has produced a report titled "Corporate control
of the food chain - the GM link" to raise concerns over GM food.
Development of these foods has an immediate bearing on both the
environment and on economy, said John Madeley, author of the report.
"This is about controlling the food chain from the seed to production and
even distribution. And its promoters are trying to gain economic and
political control to influence governments," he said.
If allowed to develop GM crops unchecked, they can begin to take over
natural crops, Mr. Madeley said.
"Wind can spread pollen from these crops, and there is no limit how far
it can spread. And patents will mean that producers will want to control
all crops it spreads to," he added. Millions of small farmers will be
threatened, the Consumers International report warns.
In one such case a GM producer has successfully sued a farmer in such a case.