GENET archive
[Index][Thread]
2-Plants: Chinese farmers favor Bt-cotton above dying from pesticides
- To: GENET-news@xs4all.nl
- Subject: 2-Plants: Chinese farmers favor Bt-cotton above dying from pesticides
- From: GENET <hmeyer@ngi.de>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:52:36 +0200
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
- Reply-To: list@xs4all.nl
- Sender: owner-genet-news@xs4all.nl
-----------------------
genet-news mailing list
-----------------------
PART I
-------------------------------- GENET-news --------------------------------
TITLE: Chinese 'Bt' cotton farmer survives insecticide poisoning
SOURCE: Today & abs-cbnNEWS.com, USA, by Jose G. Burgos Jr.
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/abs_news_body.asp?section=Provincial&
oid=5353
DATE: Oct. 8, 2002
------------------ archive: http://www.gene.ch/genet.html ------------------
Dear GENET-news readers,
obviously the success of Bt cotton in China is based on the fact that
highly toxic pesticides are allowed to be used in agriculture without
proper risk assessment and management and without proper education and
training of farmers. No necessary measures, eg capacity building for
farmers or development of IPM systems have been taken but instead money was
invested for cooperation with Monsanto to develop Bt cotton for China. The
farmers still die - unless they use Bt cotton. You might call this an
incentive to use Bt cotton.
Yours,
Hartmut Meyer
*****
Chinese 'Bt' cotton farmer survives insecticide poisoning
First of two parts
LANG FANG PREFECTURE, Hebei, China - Five years ago, Zhen-Bo Chai, a 43-
year old cotton farmer, would wake up with an uneasy feeling of nausea and
dizziness. He would also worry for his neighbors who have been encountering
similar symptoms of what was diagnosed as pesticide poisoning.
In fact, it would seem that the entire farming village populace of Dong
Zhang Wu -- located about two hours drive north of Beijing -- was under
constant threat of ill health caused by toxins released by chemical
sprayers for their various crops, the most common of which was corn and
cotton.
These days, however, Zhen goes to his two-hectare Bt (Bacillus
thuringiensis) cotton field feeling hearty and well, his sluggishness
diminished and his fears about illness, vanished. "I feel well now, unlike
when I used to spray my fields as many as 30 times for each cropping
season," the hulking farmer claimed before Filipino journalists and
scientists who visited his farm.
Zhen is one of 300 cotton farmers here whose main source of income is corn
and, since 1997, a genetically modified (GM) cotton variety.
All of the farmers have subsisted for many years from alternately
cultivating corn and a local breed of cotton. To protect their fields, the
farmers were forced to rely on pesticides in combating cotton's dreaded and
most pervasive enemy: bollworm.
This pest would devastate an entire cotton field unless farmers use
insecticides generically known as organophosphate as often as 20 to 30
times for each cropping season, or within six months after planting.
This village, which collectively nurtures 100 hectares of Bt cotton is one
of Hebei's show windows in Bt cotton production and one of the successful
cases where the controversial biotechnology crop had been adopted by
farmers in China.
According to Zhen, he is quite at peace with his new GM variety of cotton
and proudly escorted visitors to his flowering cotton field, which five
years back was a scene of desolation because of bollworm infestation, and
reeked with pesticide residues.
Zhen said that because of massive spraying of a cocktail of poisonous
chemicals every time they plant the ordinary, non-Bt cotton variety, he and
his fellow farmers -- and even their family members -- would suffer from
headaches, nausea, vomiting and other symptoms of severe respiratory
diseases.
"In fact there were times when we had to rush people to the hospitals,"
Zhen said. He claimed that one or two have succumbed to poisoning, but the
cause of the deaths could not be verified.
Besides his physical well-being, Zhen cited increased net income and less
work when he converted his farm into a Bt cotton field.
When he was planting the ordinary cotton variety his net income for every
hectare each season was an average of P33,000. But since 1997, when he
started using Bt cotton, his income rose to P55,700.
The difference was due to less cost in the chemical fight against bollworm
and lesser expenses for hired workers.
Delinted (without seeds) Bt cotton is purchased by traders of processing
centers at approximately P25 a kilo although prices had been fluctuating,
according to Zhen.
The market for cotton in China is expanding and Bt cotton farmers could not
yet supply the demands for it and a great amount of the commodity is still
imported from the United States and some countries in Asia, according to
Dr. Randy Hautea, a Filipino scientist who is the global coordinator of the
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotechnology
Applications (ISAAA).
Hautea said that the most promising results for the developing world has
been the adoption of Bt cotton by at least four million small farmers in
China.
He added that based on surveys in the Yellow River cotton-growing region in
northern China, these farmers have been able to increase their yield for
each hectare, reduce pesticide costs, cut down the time they spent spraying
dangerous pesticides and reduce the number of times they are sick from
pesticide poisoning.
He explained that Bacillus thuringiensis is a common soil bacterium which
produces a protein that is toxic to certain insects, in the case of cotton,
bollworm which feeds on cotton bolls.
However, Bt cotton is not resistant to other insects, such as mites and
aphids, which may force farmers to still use pesticides.
These pests, however, are not as prevalent and destructive as bollworms.
The experience of China in the production of Bt cotton illustrates this
populous nation's evolving rural economy that other developing countries
can study to determine their direction in adopting -- or rejecting --
genetic engineering or modification of certain important agricultural
crops, Hautea said.
To be concluded
PART II
-------------------------------- GENET-news --------------------------------
TITLE: Why genetically modified cotton thrives in China
SOURCE: Today & abs-cbnNEWS.com, USA, by Jose G. Burgos Jr.
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/abs_news_body.asp?section=Provincial&
oid=5454
DATE: Oct. 9, 2002
------------------ archive: http://www.gene.ch/genet.html ------------------
Why genetically modified cotton thrives in China
Conclusion
BEIJING - The drastic reduction of pesticide use is the main reason why
more than four million Chinese farmers are planting the controversial Bt
cotton variety.
This was reported here by Dr. Randy Hautea, a Filipino scientist who is the
global coordinator of the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-
biotech Applications (ISAAA) based at the International Rice Research
Institute in Los Banos, Laguna.
Hautea cited a series of surveys conducted by Carl Pray, Jikun Huang, Ruifa
Hu and Scott Rozelle of the Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource
Economics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey; Center for
Chinese Agricultural Policy, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural
Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; and
Department of Agricultural Resource Economics, University of California,
respectively.
The surveys conducted in 1999, 2000 and 2001 in five northern provinces in
China documented the impact of Bt cotton, demonstrating that genetically
modified (GM) cotton led to "positive and significant economic and health
benefits for poor, small farmers," who adopted the modern technology,
Hautea said.
Data from the latest survey also indicate that Bt cotton farmers have
increased their incomes by being able to whittle down their use of
pesticides and the reduction of labor.
According to the scientists who conducted the surveys, China has made a
major investment in biotechnology research which started in the mid-1980s
and unlike in most other countries which have adopted genetically
engineered crops, the researches and resulting technologies were undertaken
by the government sector.
Biotech advances in cotton production in China were prompted by the
widespread damage caused by insect pests, particularly the cotton bollworm
(Helicoverpa armigera).
China's farmers have been dependent on pesticides, specifically chlorinated
hydrocarbons (e.g. DDT) in controlling pests. But when this particular
pesticide was banned in the early '80s, they began to use organophosphates.
However, the pests developed resistance. In the early '90s other chemicals
were used but again the bollworms developed resistance until in the mid-
1990s, farmers resorted to mixing various toxic chemicals which endangered
their lives.
At that time China's cotton farmers were applying more pesticides for each
hectare on cotton than on any other field crop. Per hectare pesticide cost
reached US$101 in 1995 for cotton. Cotton production consumed nearly US$500
million in pesticides annually, according to survey data.
With funding from government research sources, the Chinese Academy of
Agricultural Sciences and other scientists from public research institutes
developed Bt cotton varieties, tested the varieties for their impact on the
environment and eventually released them for commercial use in 1997.
Hautea disclosed that the Chinese Biosafety Committee has approved the sale
of 22 Bt cotton varieties in all provinces of China.
It is estimated that farmers planted nearly 1.5 million hectares of Bt
cotton in 2001, or approximately 31 percent of ChinaÕs cotton area.
According to data gathered by Carl Pray, et. al., pesticide use has
remained low in the provinces that adopted Bt cotton. In the provinces of
Henan and Anhui, where Bt cotton was recently introduced commercially, the
main application of pesticides was reduced by 24 kilograms to 63 kilogram a
hetare.
The substantial decrease in pesticide use has also reduced the number of
farmers who are poisoned by pesticides each year, the data show. In 1999
the reduction in pesticide use was approximately 20,000 tons of formulated
pesticides, while in 2001, owing to increased area under Bt and increased
savings per hectare, the pesticide cut down was 78,000 tons, or about one
quarter of all the pesticides sprayed in China in the mid-1990s.
According to Hautea, the success of China in the rapidly growing adoption
of Bt cotton can also be traced to the important role played by local
research on biotechnology. He said that the yeoman's work done by public
researchers and the government scientists have made Chinese farmers more
confident in accepting Bt cotton as an option to improve their income and
safeguard their health.
--
|*********************************************|
| GENET |
| European NGO Network on Genetic Engineering |
| |
| Hartmut MEYER (Mr) |
| Kleine Wiese 6 |
| D - 38116 Braunschweig |
| Germany |
| |
| phone: +49-531-5168746 |
| fax: +49-531-5168747 |
| mobile: +49-162-1054755 |
| email: genetnl@xs4all.be |
|*********************************************|