GENET archive


3-Food: Zambian scientist reports on GE food information visits to the US and EU

genet-news mailing list

-------------------------------- GENET-news --------------------------------

TITLE:  Will Their Protests Leave Her Hungry?
SOURCE: The Daily Telegraph
        sent by AgBioView, USA
DATE:   Nov 20, 2002

------------------ archive: ------------------

   " 'The [UK] Department for International Development said: 'You just
   accept it because you have no choice'. As a human being, I felt that
   these people actually didn't care. You are being told you are put in
   a position where it's given to you - so just accept it.' "
                                                  Dr Mwananyanda Lewanika
                    National Institute for Science and Technology, Zambia

Will Their Protests Leave Her Hungry?
'European objections to GM food could have a devastating effect on the 
poorest countries of Africa'

When Britain launched its public debate last week on genetically modified 
crops, the talk was of government indifference to the outcome. But the 
British response to GM has an importance that extends far beyond its 
shores. While this country's full-bellied citizens discuss the niceties of 
outcrossing and allergenicity, Africans are listening from countries where 
the issues are raw and overshadowed by starvation. Only last month one 
African country rejected GM food aid after consultations in Europe.

Britain's - and Europe's - attitudes to GM are profoundly shaping the 
African response. Last week Gordon Conway, president of the development 
charity the Rockefeller Foundation, said that a European ban on GM crops 
would have a devastating effect on African agriculture.

The repercussions of the British debate can be seen most acutely in Zambia, 
where three million people face the possibility of starvation because of 
drought. Some time after international relief maize began to arrive, the 
Zambian government discovered that it was partly GM and that accepting it 
had major environmental and perhaps health implications. Lacking the 
laboratories and protocols, Zambia turned to Europe for guidance and has 
now rejected 63,000 tonnes of American maize. It even turned down milled GM 
maize, free from seeds that farmers could plant. "We believe the government 
of Zambia has disregarded the scientific evidence and is rejecting the 
advice that accepting this safe maize to feed its hungry people would help 
avert human catastrophe," the United States complained. But Zambia looks to 
Europe, not to America.

Britain's pressure groups have had a hotline to the Zambian scientists 
entrusted with advising their government about GM relief maize. The 
Zambians have instinctively accepted their suspicion of the motives of the 
United States in flooding Africa with GM food - and they have been 
particularly moved by the health fears that erupted in Britain in 1999.

In September, Zambia's scientists sped around Britain, Brussels, Holland, 
Norway, America and South Africa on a quest to understand GM issues. One of 
the seven-member team told me: "I did see things differently from the way I 
saw them before I left: I got more scared."

Dr Mwananyanda Lewanika is a biochemist at Zambia's National Institute for 
Science and Technology, holds two degrees from American universities and 
has specialised in biosafety for five years. He explained that his team 
rejected the maize largely because of health concerns raised in Europe. His 
first concern is gene transfer - the idea that the foreign genes in GM 
plants could, while in the gut, transfer into the cells of the body or into 
bacteria in the gut. If the genes coded for antibiotic resistance, as they 
sometimes do, bacteria that picked them up could then rampage unchecked 
through human populations. Zambia's science minister, Abel Chambeshi, said 
a fortnight ago that donors are refusing to tell Zambia what kind of GM 
maize they have given.

Dr Lewanika also fears unintended effects resulting from gene insertion - 
that the functions of genes are not fully understood, and they may produce 
unpredicted substances that could be poisonous or allergenic.

How could Zambia's scientists have attached such weight to health risks 
that are mostly irrelevant to those who face starvation? During their three 
days in Britain, as well as meeting representatives from five government 
bodies, the team met a host of NGOs, many of whom pressed the health 
issues. According to the Zambia Daily Mail, Farming and Livestock Concern 
UK said that the virus used to create most GM varieties "could form a 
retrovirus that could produce symptoms similar to HIV", a claim that will 
raise eyebrows among biologists. Genetic Food Alert raised the "unknown and 
unassessed implications of providing large quantities of food containing 
resistance genes to a large population in Zambia". The scientists 
themselves report that they met a host of groups, such as Econexas, the 
Natural Law Party and the Third World Network, as well as hearing the 
arguments of more well known organisations, such as Greenpeace, Friends of 
the Earth and the Soil Association.

These meetings convinced them that the health risks of GM are of even 
greater concern to Africans than to the First World. "The people of Zambia 
are in poor health," says Dr Lewanika. "Many are immune-compromised. If the 
health concerns are true, they are more likely to affect those in Zambia."

The fact that Zambians eat untreated maize, while Americans eat their GM 
maize in a highly processed form, was also important to the scientists. "In 
Zambia corn is eaten as nshima [a porridge] for breakfast, lunch and 
supper. In America they eat it as cornflakes and tortilla chips, while corn 
on the cob is not genetically modified." Foreign proteins in the maize 
would perish en route to becoming cornflakes, he argues, but might survive 
the mild simmering that turns maize flour into porridge.

Kainyua M'bijjewe, Monsanto's spokesman in Africa, has accused groups such 
as Greenpeace of perpetuating starvation by helping to persuade African 
governments to reject GM foods. But Dr Lewanika dismisses such claims, 
saying that he is capable of assessing the soundness of research for 

Instead, he says, it was the groups who thought Zambia should accept the GM 
maize that failed to provide scientific arguments. They came across as 
patronising and unsympathetic to the anguish that has characterised 
Zambia's GM trouble.

Prof David King, Britain's chief scientist, appeared to Dr Lewanika to be 
dismissive. "He said that Zambia doesn't have a choice [and must accept GM 
maize]. But he also said that he does have a choice so he would not eat it 

"The Department for International Development said: 'You just accept it 
because you have no choice'. As a human being, I felt that these people 
actually didn't care. You are being told you are put in a position where 
it's given to you - so just accept it."

The pattern was repeated in the United States. "We met no one who could put 
scientific arguments for accepting GM. We were just told, first, that they 
are tested and, second, that they are eaten in the States. But when we went 
to the National Academy of Sciences and obtained a copy of their report 
assessing the regulatory mechanism in the US it says it falls far short of 
what should be done."

The five other famine-threatened countries in southern Africa have accepted 
GM relief maize - four of them provided it is milled before distribution, a 
process that is expensive and time-consuming but eliminates environmental 
risks. But milling protects them only from an immediate invasion of GM. Mr 
Conway's argument is that Africa's agricultural future depends on Europe 
becoming more receptive to GM crops. If Europe rejects GM, then African 
countries that accept it could lose their export markets.

"If in effect the EU says we will not buy any food from any country that 
happens to have GM crops growing in it, that will have enormous effect on 
African agriculture," he said.

Greenpeace has told Zambia that its burgeoning business selling organic 
produce to Europe could collapse if it accepts GM. The EU has denied this 
but Zambia decided to believe the NGOs. Peter Masunu, spokesman for the 
Zambian Department of Agriculture, said: "The Zambian government does not 
have the capacity to detect whether food is genetically modified, we have 
not yet ratified the Cartagena agreement [covering the transport and use of 
modified organisms] and we have no legislation in place on biotechnology 
and biosafety."

Whether Zambia will weather its immediate storm, and feed its hungry 
without the help of GM maize, is debatable - no one can even agree how much 
non-GM maize is available. In the long term, Mr Conway argues, Africa's 
fate lies in European minds, shaped by debates such as that launched in 

"The developing countries, especially African, desperately need new crop 
variety, new medicines and vaccines. GM technology in Africa is not a 
silver bullet. But it is going to be essential if we are to produce crops 
resistant to pests, disease and weeds, tolerant of drought and of high 
nutritional quality." 


|                   GENET                     |
| European NGO Network on Genetic Engineering |
|                                             |
|             Hartmut MEYER (Mr)              |
|               Kleine Wiese 6                |
|           D - 38116 Braunschweig            |
|                 Germany                     |
|                                             |
| phone:  +49-531-5168746                     |
| fax:    +49-531-5168747                     |                      
| mobile: +49-162-1054755                     |
| email:                   |