GENET archive
[Index][Thread]
2-Plants: Indian National Institute of Nutrition critical on "golden rice" benefits
- To: GENET-news@xs4all.nl
- Subject: 2-Plants: Indian National Institute of Nutrition critical on "golden rice" benefits
- From: GENET <hmeyer@ngi.de>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:42:28 +0100
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- Reply-To: list@xs4all.nl
- Sender: owner-genet-news@xs4all.nl
-----------------------
genet-news mailing list
-----------------------
PART I
-------------------------------- GENET-news --------------------------------
TITLE: Can Golden rice eradicate vitamin A deficiency?
SOURCE: The Hindu, India, by Ramesh V. Bhat and S.Vasanthi
National Institute of Nutrition Hyderabad
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/seta/stories/
2002120500070200.htm
DATE: Dec 5, 2002
------------------ archive: http://www.gene.ch/genet.html ------------------
Dear GENET-news readers,
apart from the scientific uncertainty about bioavailability of b-carotene
in a rice diet and the fact that the researchers are not any longer willing
to inform the public about the actual levels of b-carotene in the current
experimental GE strains there is another interesting issue about "golden
rice".
As it has been reported in the case of Bt-rice given by Ciba Geigy (now
part of Syngenta/Zeneca) to the IRRI the licence contract includes a
section that imposes trade restrictions on living rice kernels to prevent
it from be exported into the 20 Member States of the European Patent
Convention, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the U.S.. The promotors of
"golden rice" often claimed that they are willing to cross the experimental
GE rice into the currently used farmer varieties. If that is really their
intention and considering Dr. Beyer's comment: "Farmers can produce and
sell Golden rice to the tune of $10,000 a year. But they can only sell it
within the country and not export it," we have to think about the
consequences of the planned ubiquitous spread of the "golden rice"-
transgenes in farmers' varieties.
I do not know whether and to which extent the harvest of those varieties is
exported or consumed locally. But in any case each rice variety that
carries the "golden rice"-transgenes seems to be barred from export. If
that is really true, the "golden rice"-story gains a completely new
dimension. The celebrated licence agreement in which biotech companies
allow the use of patented technology for humanitarian use could have the
potential to serev as means to control the rice economy of a whole country.
Yours,
Hartmut Meyer
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The current dietary intake of betacarotene among these children is
estimated to be 788 microgram per day. Golden rice would provide an
additional intake of betacarotene of 186 microgram per day. Thus,
while from the current diet 49 per cent of RDA of betacarotene is met
and from golden rice an additional 12 per cent, the total from both
sources would be 61 per cent. However, Dr.Peter Beyer of the University
of Freiberg, Germany, who along with Dr.Ingo Potrykus is the developer
of the Golden rice, claimed that 'whatever quantity they eat would be
sufficient to keep blindness and other problems at bay' (The Hindu,
7 Nov, 2002). Based on the above data, obviously such a claim appears
to be not correct."
Ramesh V. Bhat and S.Vasanthi
National Institute of Nutrition Hyderabad
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Can Golden rice eradicate vitamin A deficiency?
VARIOUS KINDS of transgenic rice are being developed for a range of
characteristics.
These are developed to be used both as food as well as for industrial
purposes. Among these, nutritional enrichment has been receiving
considerable attention especially in India.
Among all the transgenic crops, transgenic rice is claimed to provide
maximum benefit to the consumer while other crops provide benefit mostly to
the producer. .
Nutritional Genomics has been applied to rice for the development of Golden
rice, iron enhanced rice and rice with enhanced proteins and amino acid.
The proponents of Golden rice claim that its consumption provides the
required vitamin A dose to prevent nutritional blindness in populations
where xerophthalmia is endemic.
Although the initial experiments with Golden rice appear to indicate
potential for alleviating vitamin A malnutrition, there is a need to
examine in depth several factors before accepting this technology as an
intervention strategy.
The total dietary exposure and exposure to the modified nutrient among
various age groups, especially the vulnerable segment of the population
need to be considered.
An adult would have to eat 3.7 kg (equivalent to about 9 kg of cooked rice)
to obtain the total daily requirement of vitamin A. The projected serving
size of 300 gm is claimed to provide only 8 per cent of the daily
requirement. On the other hand, the developers of the transgenic crop
dispute the calculation and suggest that only 0.75-1.5 kg rice would have
to be consumed to meet the recommended daily allowance (RDA) and rice can
provide 20-40 per cent of the RDA from a 300 g serving.
Since rice is a staple food in large parts of the country and vitamin A
deficiency is still a problem of public health significance, specially
among children, it is essential to look into the Indian scenario.
The surveys of the National Nutrition Monitoring Bureau indicate that the
average cereal intake is 106 gm per day among 1-3 year old children. As per
the ICMR Expert Committee, RDA for age groups 1-3 years of retinol
equivalents in India is 400 microgram per day while for betacarotene it
is1600 microgram per day.
The current dietary intake of betacarotene among these children is
estimated to be 788 microgram per day. Golden rice would provide an
additional intake of betacarotene of 186 microgram per day. Thus, while
from the current diet 49 per cent of RDA of betacarotene is met and from
golden rice an additional 12 per cent, the total from both sources would be
61 per cent.
However, Dr.Peter Beyer of the University of Freiberg, Germany, who along
with Dr.Ingo Potrykus is the developer of the Golden rice, claimed that
"whatever quantity they eat would be sufficient to keep blindness and other
problems at bay" (The Hindu, 7 Nov, 2002). Based on the above data,
obviously such a claim appears to be not correct.
Another important fact that has to be considered in this context is the
bioavailability of betacarotene in the Indian context. The bioavailability
of betacarotene is low compared to vitamin A and it depends on various
dietary factors like level of protein and fat in the diet, protein and fat
stores and cooking and processing methods.
Protein Energy Malnutrition and intestinal infections and infestations
affect the absorption of vitamin A among children. Moreover, an intake of
at least 5gm fat is necessary for betacarotene absorption. The consumption
of fat among the needy communities is woefully inadequate.
An evaluation of bioavailability of betacarotene from Golden rice requires
to be urgently assessed before any conclusions about the actual potential
of Golden rice to meet its requirements are drawn.
There is no information as yet on consistency of the level of betacarotene
production in Golden rice, particularly with respect to the nutrient
amounts as claimed, when it is grown in different environmental conditions,
in different locations under different levels of fertilizer application and
management. What is more important is the acceptability of yellow Golden
rice that requires further investigation.
Thus, many questions are yet to be answered and we have miles to go before
Golden rice can be claimed to help eradicate the problem of vitamin A
deficiency in the country.
Ramesh V. Bhat and S.Vasanthi
National Institute of Nutrition Hyderabad
PART II
-------------------------------- GENET-news --------------------------------
TITLE: Can Golden rice keep vitamin A deficiency at bay?
SOURCE: The Hindu, India, Interview with Peter Beyer
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/seta/2002/11/07/stories/
2002110700070200.htm
DATE: Nov 7, 2002
------------------ archive: http://www.gene.ch/genet.html ------------------
Can Golden rice keep vitamin A deficiency at bay?
Golden rice biofortified with pro-vitamin A is intended to supply the
required vitamin A dose to prevent blindness in malnourished population. It
will be made freely available to developing countries and the farmers will
be allowed to use the produce as seeds and cross them with other varieties.
Peter Beyer of the University of Freiburg, Germany was one of the two
scientists who created the Golden rice. As a member of the Humanitarian
Board his mission is to make the Golden rice freely available to farmers in
developing countries. Seeds would be made available to India early next
year and would undergo field trials. The final product is expected to be
available in 2-3 years' time. R. Prasad spoke to Dr. Beyer on various
aspects of Golden rice when he was in Chennai recently.
WHAT IS the advantage of adding pro-vitamin A in rice?
A vast majority of the population, especially those below the poverty line
in developing countries, are malnourished. Vitamin A is specifically
required for preventing night blindness and to ensure normal development
and growth. It is not to say that malnourished people especially children
suffer only from vitamin A deficiency. But this is just the first step in
meeting their micronutrient requirements.
Why did you choose this route when well-established methods like food
fortification exist?
Fortifying food is a well-proven technology but you should remember that it
is very expensive. And when the entire exercise is to make it available to
the poor it makes little sense to go this route. The same holds good in the
case of drugs too. On the other hand, getting the crop plants themselves to
do the job of fortifying a required vitamin is an ideal solution.
Biofortification as it is called is less expensive and can be easily
delivered to the target audience when done in crops like rice that is a
staple food. Moreover, distribution of Golden rice seeds to the farmer will
be a one-time process unlike supplying drugs or fortified food.
Why is the Golden rice yellow?
Biofortification of rice is done in the form of pro-vitamin A and not as
vitamin A. Pro-vitamin A otherwise called betacarotene gives the rice the
yellow hue. Plants normally contain vitamins in the form of pro-vitamin A.
Carrot and pumpkin are also rich in pro-vitamin A.
Does pro-vitamin A not occur naturally in rice?
Rice does contain pro-vitamin A. But unfortunately it is not found in the
grains but in the leaves and roots. Scientifically speaking, grains do have
the genes that are responsible for making pro-vitamin A but the genes are
not expressed unlike in the case of leaves and roots.
But is it true that some varieties of unpolished rice do contain pro-
vitamin A?
All rice cultivated has some pro-vitamin A in the outer layers. But it is
extremely little and is lost when polished. The reason for polishing is to
enable rice storage in tropical climate as otherwise it would turn rancid.
How do you make the grains produce pro-vitamin A?
Genes consist of DNA. To be functional, however, a gene needs a piece of
DNA sequence in front of it that acts as a molecular switch, able to
activate or to inactivate the gene. This switch is called a promoter. The
promoter plus the structural gene associated with it is known as
'expression cassette'. Only these two together will render a gene
functional.
Promoters come in two main classes, namely, constitutive and tissue
specific. Constitutive promoters can activate in any tissue of the plant
while tissue specific promoters activate a given gene only in certain parts
of the plant, such as in the grain. By using endosperm-specific promoters
(the endosperm is the tissue that represents the edible portion of the rice
grain) fused with structural genes for carotenoid biosynthesis, we ensured
pro-vitamin A formation in this tissue.
There is a criticism that children, the main targets of this exercise, will
not stand to benefit as the quantity of rice they consume is less?
The apprehension is misplaced and the criticism baseless. It's true that
the quantity of rice that children would eat will be less than adults. But
whatever quantity they eat would be sufficient to keep blindness and other
problems at bay. And our goal is to achieve this and not meet 100 per cent
of body's requirement.
Is utilisation of vitamin A dependent on the presence of other
micronutirents in our body?
You should ask nutritionists about this. But it is known that a better
vitamin A status enhances the bioavailability of iron. Nutritional testing
is underway.
What is the amount of pro-vitamin A that will be available in the grains?
The exact amount has to be decided based on field trials to be undertaken
in India soon. But a basic point to be understood is that the grain's
yellow colour would become richer as the amount of pro-vitamin A available
goes up. Importantly, it remains to be seen whether people would accept
yellow colour rice let alone deep yellow coloured ones.
Is there a way to produce grains without the yellow colour?
Yes it is possible. But then grains would be able to produce vitamin A and
not pro-vitamin A. Plants only produce pro-vitamin A and the same is
converted to vitamin A by our body. The advantage with pro-vitamin A is
that there is never a threat of toxicity due to excess consumption. This is
not the case with vitamin A as there is a theoretical possibility of toxic
levels being reached.
Can the poor afford to buy Golden rice?
The main intention behind this entire exercise is to make it available to
the poor. The first step to achieve this is to make the seeds available to
farmers at no extra cost. What use is this product if it is expensive for
the poor to buy just because the seeds are sold at a premium to farmers?
All out efforts to reduce vitamin A deficiency through biofortification of
rice stands defeated if we do so.
What made you make this technology freely available to farmers?
Here I have an invention that is of very little value in the developed
countries as vitamin A deficiency is a non-issue. But it has large benefits
for the developing countries. So will you think of making a profit from
such an invention? I will not. Will you dream of making profit for
inventing AIDS vaccine if the disease is affecting only the poor African
countries?
Can you elaborate on this?
European Community Project was one of two sponsors of this project. The
first sponsor was Rockefeller Foundation. Syngenta is the industrial
partner in the European Community project. According to the agreement the
company Zeneca has exclusive rights to sell the seeds in the developed
countries. But the Humanitarian Board got the licence back from Zeneca to
give it to developing countries free of cost. The only obligation on our
part is that we use it for humanitarian purpose and not make any profit
from it.
Is there any string attached when you give the licence to a developing
country?
The only condition is that seeds should be provided to farmers and not to
commercial organisations. Farmers can produce and sell Golden rice to the
tune of $10,000 a year. But they can only sell it within the country and
not export it.
Can the farmer keep some part of his produce as seeds for use later?
All the rights of the farmer are preserved. The license allows him to use
the produce as seeds, to produce new hybrids by crossing it with existing
varieties to name a few.
How difficult was the task of dealing with other patent holders?
It took nearly one and half years of negotiation to deal with the ten
holders in Asia. It is for the first time that such a large number of
patent holders waived their IPR (intellectual property rights) claims on
the product for non-commercial purpose.
What about the threat of gene transfer from Golden rice?
Gene transfer is less of a problem with Golden rice though it can happen.
Out crossing is not a major issue in rice unlike other crops. But even if
it happens, the ecological impact will be less, as the gene modification
has to do with pro-vitamin A which is only a micronutrient.
How safe are promoters taken from other organisms to insert the gene into
Golden rice?
The 35S promoter we used ranks under 'constitutive' and is most commonly
used to drive the selectable marker gene. Generally, promoters are of very
little concern, because they will never become a protein.
Is it true that the transformation process is random and there is no way to
target the foreign genes to precise locations in the genome?
Only one transformation event out of hundreds will make it to a product and
this is checked for any problems that may have occurred.
Can inserts be rearranged, or subject to deletions or repetitions?
Using soil bacterium Agrobacterium, rearrangements are practically absent
and if it occurred, such lines are discarded and will never make it through
the regulatory process.
Is there a guarantee that GM plants will give stable progeny in successive
generations? Can inserted genes lose their activity in subsequent
generations?
All plants that are deregulated are stable and have shown to behave
normally over many years. Think about all the GMOs being grown in the U.S.
Do you really believe that these farmers would grow it if the trait could
not be maintained? To pass through regulations you must prove for stability
over many generations.
--
|*********************************************|
| GENET |
| European NGO Network on Genetic Engineering |
| |
| Hartmut MEYER (Mr) |
| Kleine Wiese 6 |
| D - 38116 Braunschweig |
| Germany |
| |
| phone: +49-531-5168746 |
| fax: +49-531-5168747 |
| mobile: +49-162-1054755 |
| email: genetnl@xs4all.be |
|*********************************************|