GENET archive
[Index][Thread]
3-Food: U.S. projects play key role in African biosafety capacity building
- To: GENET-news@xs4all.nl
- Subject: 3-Food: U.S. projects play key role in African biosafety capacity building
- From: GENET <genetnl@xs4all.be>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:07:02 +0200
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- Reply-To: list@xs4all.nl
- Sender: owner-genet-news@xs4all.nl
-----------------------
genet-news mailing list
-----------------------
PART I
-------------------------------- GENET-news --------------------------------
TITLE: ... bio-safety key to GMOs verification
SOURCE: Zambian News Agency
http://www.zamnet.zm/newsys/news/viewnews.cgi?category=3&id=
1029311373
DATE: Aug. 15, 2002
------------------ archive: http://www.gene.ch/genet.html ------------------
... bio-safety key to GMOs verification
A South African Microbiologist Ann Koch has said bio-safety is an important
element to the process of verifying the viability of Genetically Modified
Foods offered by the United States government as relief food.
Ms. Koch, who is also chairperson of the Africa-Bio Education and Training
working group, told journalists in Lusaka today that there is need for
thorough safety checks and testing of GM grain before commercialising or
importing it.
She said scientists in the country should ensure that food and feed safety
of GMFs is extensively checked on every shipload.
She observed that Zambia has highly qualified specialists, who have the
capacity to determine the nutritional status and safety of both
conventional maize and GMOÕs imported from countries that produce biotech
crops.
Ms. Koch advised that governments decision on whether or not to accept the
offer of GM maize from the USA would largely depend on the assessment by
scientists on the impact of GM grain on the economy, sustainable
development and poverty alleviation.
While brushing aside suggestions that the GM maize should be milled before
being exported, Ms. Koch said the Zambian government should look for
alternative sources of food before making a decision to reject the US offer
of GM relief maize.
Ms Koch pointed out that in South Africa, 500 food trials and processing
applications of GM crops have been successfully undertaken and that four
GMOÕs including insect tolerant maize have so far been approved.
She also dismissed the notion that GMOÕs have a grave environmental impact
in Africa saying the nature of the continent's bio-diversity quickly
eliminates the impact.
Ms. Koch urged scientists in the country to exhaustively look at the
available safety information in order to come up with a recommendation to
government on a viable regulatory framework on GMOs.
Efforts to get a comment from Agriculture minister Mundia Sikatana proved
futile as he was reported locked in a meeting.
PART II
-------------------------------- GENET-news --------------------------------
TITLE: US sheds more light on GM maize
SOURCE: The Post, Zambia, by Brighton Phiri
http://www.post.co.zm/
DATE: Aug 14, 2002
------------------ archive: http://www.gene.ch/genet.html ------------------
US sheds more light on GM maize
THE estimation that 2.5 million Zambians are at the risk of starvation were
under-represented during the government organised debate on Genetically
Modified Organisms (GMOs), charged the US government yesterday. And South
African biosafety consultant Muffy Koch said Zambian scientists were split
over the GMOs because they have not been exposed to safety information. In
a statement released by the US embassy in Lusaka, the US government claimed
that during the course of the indaba several local speakers raised some
points that were misleading and inaccurate. "Although the voices of some
key stakeholders, such as the 2.5 million Zambians at the risk of
starvation, seemed under-represented, the indaba, nonetheless offered an
opportunity for many stakeholders to share their information," read the
statement in part. "Regrettably, in the course of the indaba several
speakers made points concerning the US' role in providing relief food that
were misleading and inaccurate."
According to the statement the US $50 million loan was a last resort safety
net for the Zambian government, should its current arrangements to procure
sufficient quantities of maize for the commercial market fall short. "In
any case, the government would need to work out with the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) arrangements for such a loan given the implications for
Zambia's HIPC status," read the statement in part. "At this point, there is
no specific loan proposal on the table and the Embassy hopes, the
Government of the Republic of Zambia will not need at any point to exercise
this last resort safety net option."
The US government stated that no efforts were being made in that country to
separate GM maize and non-GM maize as regulatory agencies did not
differentiate between the safety of two brands of maize. The US government
dismissed assertions that it was forcing Zambians to accept its maize for
various ulterior motives. It reminded Zambians that the donated food was
procured on the US market, transported to its final destination and made
available to the hungry people at its taxpayers' expense. "Instead of
building more schools or roads in America, the US government has, for
humanitarian reasons, dedicated significant resources each year to help
feed vulnerable people around the world," read the statement. The statement
further stated that Americans consumed genetically modified maize.
Earlier, addressing the press at Lusaka's American Centre, Koch disclosed
that some countries in the region were still resisting to accept GM maize
due lack of safety information on GMOs. She named Malawi as one of the
countries which was in the process of establishing a safety framework to
determine the safety of GMFs. Koch defended the US GM maize saying the
product had not produced any side effects. "We have been eating the US
maize since 1996," Koch said. She said Zambian scientists lacked a platform
to discuss the safety of GMOs. Koch said the situation was worsened by the
country's lack of a safety framework to facilitate the assessment of GMOs.
"Zambian scientists have the capacity to assess the safety of GMOs. All
they need is good laboratories and safety framework," she said.
Zambezi West UPND member of parliament Charles Kakoma said the 23,000
metric tonnes of GM maize being donated by the US government should be
burnt. "By doing so we will be sending a signal to our donors that if they
want to help, they should do so in good faith. In Zambia we value our
lives. These lives cannot be experimented upon," Kakoma said. He said GM
maize should not be donated at the expense of the lives of starving
Zambians. Kakoma warned that he was going to politicise the issue if
government accepted the GM maize. He advised the Zambian government to
emulate the European countries which have rejected GMFs.
The US on Monday came under severe attack from Zambians for insisting that
government must accept genetically modified foods (GMFs) if it has to be
granted a US $50 million loan. Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection
(JCTR) and Kasisi Agricultural Training Centre consultant Bernadette
Lubozhya said government's initial rejection of US GM maize should be
maintained. She said the national biotechnology and biosafety policy
currently being considered by government should be subjected to wide public
discussion with full involvement of all stakeholders. "Government should
undertake immediate steps to build the capacity necessary for testing
agricultural products to detect the introduction of GMOs," Lubozhya said.
"This requires greater laboratory facilities."
PART III
-------------------------------- GENET-news --------------------------------
TITLE: Media Has Key Role In African Biosafety
SOURCE: Southern African Regional Biosafety Network, South Africa
posted by AgBioView, USA
DATE: November 2001
------------------ archive: http://www.gene.ch/genet.html ------------------
Media Has Key Role In African Biosafety
The media has a critical role to play in the introduction of new technology
such as biotechnology into Southern African countries. This was the
conclusion of a Southern African Regional Biosafety network meeting on
Information Dissemination.
"The region is flooded with misinformation about biotechnology and strong
reservations exist at most levels" says Muffy Koch of SARB. However, the
press and government want to know about practical effects. "The media and
regulators/policy makers are very interested in examples of how the
technology is impacting on small farmers in Africa and we need many more
examples, like cotton in the Makhatini, to illustrate the potential of the
technology," she says.
SARB was launched in 2000 and is administered by the Agricultural
Biotechnology Support Project (http://www.iia.msu.edu/absp/) (ABSP) at
Michigan State University, USA, but managed by the Vegetable and Ornamental
Plant Institute (http://www.arc.agric.za/institutes/roodeplaat/main/
intro.htm) (VOPI), Agricultural Research Council of South Africa. The
programme aims to build regional policy and technical capacity to support
science-based regulation of the development, commercial application, and
trade in agricultural products derived from modern biotechnology. Regional
co-operation and the harmonization of biosafety implementation in the
region are also key to the project.
While the UNEP biosafety project will probably result in a degree of
similarity between regulations, there are variations in the level of
caution required from country to country, says Koch. However, she is
critical of The African Model Law developed by the OAU (now the AU), saying
that this is "a poor working model, designed to impede rather than promote
safe and useful technology. Countries choosing this model will end up with
regulations that cannot be implemented and will effectively ban the use of
all existing products of GM, e.g. medicines, food ingredients and
industrial enzymes, and contravene the terms of the Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety."
Muffy Koch works in South Africa, one of the three SARB countries, also
including Mozambique and Zimbabwe which are developing GM crops in-country.
"Malawi is setting up GM facilities, but Zambia, Namibia and Mozambique
have no GM capacity", she says. There is also a range of development of
biosafety capacity, varying from no regulations (Mozambique) to draft
regulations (Mauritius, Namibia, Malawi) to completed GM legislation (South
Africa and Zimbabwe). "Most other African countries have no regulations,
but Uganda, Kenya and Egypt have interim guidelines" she says. It will be
some time before commercial approvals are given outside of South Africa,
says Koch. "Egypt is the closest technically. The other countries are 3 to
5 years away from this."
SARB has planned a series of in-country biosafety capacity building events,
starting in 2001 and continuing into 2003. At the end of 2001 a detailed
risk assessment-training course will be run for 35 regional scientists who
will join a critical mass of biosafety review expertise in the region.
"This expertise will be accessible to all countries in the region to ensure
that sufficient capacity is available to assist governments in national
decision-making" says Koch.
A risk assessment field trial to collect biosafety data on GM sorghum is
scheduled for 2002-2003 and SARB will also focus on raising awareness about
the role to biotechnology in government departments in the region. This
will include a trip to China for government officials to investigate how
relevant the technology is for small scale farming in the Southern African
region.
Contact Information
>From The AgBiotechNet, Institute of International Agriculture, Michigan
State University, East Lansing , MI, 48824-1039, United States;
Email:absp@pilot.msu.edu
http://www.iia.msu.edu/absp/
For more on developing country issues, visit our hot topic at
http://www.agbiotechnet.com/topics/database/Developing/developing.asp
--
|*********************************************|
| GENET |
| European NGO Network on Genetic Engineering |
| |
| Hartmut MEYER (Mr) |
| Kleine Wiese 6 |
| D - 38116 Braunschweig |
| Germany |
| |
| phone: +49-531-5168746 |
| fax: +49-531-5168747 |
| mobile: +49-162-1054755 |
| email: genetnl@xs4all.be |
|*********************************************|