GENET archive
[Index][Thread]
8-Misc: South African Catholic Bishops' Conference and environmental NGOs critical on GMOs
- To: GENET-news@agoranet.be
- Subject: 8-Misc: South African Catholic Bishops' Conference and environmental NGOs critical on GMOs
- From: GENETNL <genetnl@xs4all.be>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:05:04 +0200
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- Reply-To: list@xs4all.nl
- Sender: owner-genet-news@xs4all.nl
-----------------------
genet-news mailing list
-----------------------
-------------------------------- GENET-news --------------------------------
TITLE: A) Church calls for moratorium on genetically engineered food
B) South African newspaper questions Aventis application there for
StarLink
SOURCE: A) Panafrican News Agency
http://allafrica.com/stories/200011080331.html
B) Johannesburg Mail and Guardian via Africa News Service
by Fiona Macleod
http://www.agweb.com/news/news.cfm?id=15089&service=27
DATE: A) November 8, 2000
B) November 10, 2000
------------------ archive: http://www.gene.ch/genet.html ------------------
A) Church calls for moratorium on genetically engineered food
The Southern African Catholic Bishops' Conference Wednesday expressed its
concern over the utilisation of Genetic Engineering or GE technologies in
agriculture and food production. Tens of thousands of hectares in South
Africa have been planted with GE crops. Modified maize and cotton are
already commercially produced, while soybean, potato, tomato, apple and
canola are in a trial phase.
The Rev. Wilfred Napier, archbishop of Durban, said GE is an imprecise
technology and that the long-term health effects of consuming GE food have
not been assessed. "Scientists are warning that new allergens, carcinogens
and toxins may be introduced into foods," he said. "Moreover, the damage to
the environment would be largely irreversible. Once released, genetically
engineered organisms become part of our ecosystem."
He added that another major issue posed by the transgenic crop technologies
is the cross-pollination of neighbouring non-GE crops due to pollen drift.
This pollution could result in the eradication of biodiversity in areas
bordering genetically modified crops. "Because we do not know whether there
are any serious risks to the environment or human health, to produce and
market genetically modified food is morally irresponsible. The
precautionary principle should apply, as it is done in medical research,"
he said.
He called on the government to introduce a five-year freeze on genetic
engineering, in support of the campaign launched by the South African
Freeze Alliance on Genetic Engineering. "We agree that a five-year period
is the minimum time needed to implement stringent safety tests on GE foods
and to thoroughly research the health, safety and environmental impacts of
GE crops. "During this time the import and export of GE foods and crops as
well as the patenting of seeds for food and farm crops should be stopped,"
Napier said. He also urged the government to introduce compulsory labelling
of GE food and sign the international Protocol on Biosafety which requires
that countries exporting genetically modified organisms provide, in
advance, detailed information to the importing country.
*****
B) South African newspaper questions Aventis application there for StarLink
Johannesburg -- Aventis, which has been denied entry of its products into
Europe by the EU, has applied to grow its genetically modified crop in
South Africa. A company that has had to remove about 300 food products from
United States supermarket shelves because they contain a genetically
engineered maize that may cause human allergies now wants to grow the crop
in South Africa. The French-based pharmaceuticals giant Aventis has applied
to the Department of Agriculture for a permit to introduce the crop to
South Africa. The maize is known as StarLink and it has been engineered to
contain a gene that is suspected to cause allergies.
Aventis had permission to grow the crop in the US only for animal foods and
industrial use. But the discovery of StarLink in the human food chain in
the past weeks has caused mass hysteria among consumers. Snacks, cereals
and restaurant foods produced by major brand names like Kraft Foods,
Safeway and Western Family Foods have been recalled and two large food
companies shut down their production lines. Many of the contaminated
products are sold under different brand names, so it is difficult for
consumers to know whether the food in their pantry is suspect.
At least one lawsuit has been filed against Kraft by a Chicago man who
claims he suffered severe stomach cramps, diarrhoea, a headache and hives
after eating tacos made with contaminated maize. StarLink contains a
pesticide gene, Cry9C, that is resistant to heat and difficult to digest.
It is this gene that is suspected to cause allergies. In its application to
the Department of Agriculture in September, Aventis said it wants to grow
maize with the Cry9C gene in South African "research trials". This involves
testing the crop in local conditions before it can be grown commercially.
"Even if StarLink maize is grown commercially for animal consumption or
industrial purposes only, can we stop the contamination of other
foodstuffs?" asks Mariam Mayet, a Johannesburg lawyer who specialises in
legislation on genetic engineering. "South Africa does not require
genetically modified food to be segregated from that which has not been
genetically modified. Labeling is also not required, which means the
consumer will be unaware that he is consuming contaminated foods that have
specifically not been approved for human consumption."
The StarLink scare in the US has raised questions about whether it is
practically possible to segregate maize approved for human consumption from
unapproved crops. It has not been established how the mix-up happened, but
the problem starts with the crop's tendency to cross-pollinate while it is
growing. Aventis created buffer zones of 22m around the StarLink maize
fields, but now acknowledges the distance may not be enough. "This case
clearly calls for South Africa to use the precautionary principle and ban
the import of any genetically modified crop that may cause harm to human
health or may enter the human food supply," says Mayet.
The European Commission, which is investigating the possibility that
StarLink products may have been exported to Europe, last week said it had
invoked the precautionary principle in dealing with StarLink. "Until we
have a risk assessment, it's better to keep it out," said Wilfried
Schneider, a representative of the European Union (EU) delegation to the
US. The EU has enforced mandatory labeling of genetically engineered
products for the past two years. In Japan, where StarLink is not approved
even for animal feed, the consumers' union has reported detecting it in
snack foods and animal feed sold locally. The country is now trying to
source its maize supply elsewhere.
Department of Agriculture representative Magriet Engelbrecht says the
Aventis application to bring StarLink to South Africa is being reviewed by
an advisory committee. She says a final decision is unlikely before
January. "What happens in other countries is going to be taken into account
by the committee," Engelbrecht adds. "The experience in the US will play a
role."
Aventis has offered to buy back much of its maize crop grown in the US this
year. The company says it has new data to demonstrate that fears about
allergies are unfounded and has asked for temporary approval of the maize
from the US authorities so that it can wend its way through the food supply
without disrupting markets. There is no record of StarLink maize shipments
having been imported into South Africa, though it may be present in
foodstuffs imported from the US. "In other countries the StarLink
contaminations have been picked up by consumer groups who insist on testing
food for genetic modification," says Earthlife Africa's Glenda Lindsay. "In
South Africa the NGOs don't have the resources to do this."
On December 1 last year the government finally pushed through the
Genetically Modified Organisms Act of 1997 in an attempt to tighten
regulation of the fast- growing field of genetic engineering. But Mayet
says the Act still falls short of international safeguards. "Monitoring by
civil society groups is extremely difficult. Information about foreseeable
impacts and emergency measures in the case of an accident is not
available," she says. "These are typical risk-management measures and
should be the hallmarks of any bio- safety legislation. But they are not
set out in the Act or its regulations."
The Aventis application to introduce StarLink crops is one of 111 permit
applications received by the department between January and October
relating to genetically modified organisms. The applications, most from the
US, are for a variety of activities, including commercial releases, field
trials, contained use and commodity imports for human and animal
consumption. A total of 106 applications have been successful and five are
under review. Before the Act was passed last year, 165 field trials were
approved and two commercial releases were authorised, for the commercial
planting of an insect- resistant maize crop and an insect- resistant type
of cotton.
|*********************************************|
| GENET |
| European NGO Network on Genetic Engineering |
| |
| Hartmut MEYER (Mr) |
| Kleine Wiese 6 |
| D - 38116 Braunschweig |
| Germany |
| |
| phone: +49-531-5168746 |
| fax: +49-531-5168747 |
| email: genetnl@xs4all.be |
|*********************************************|