GENET archive

[Index][Thread]

2-Plants: Monsanto Behind Legislation to Regulate Open-Pollinated Seed



mailinglist genet-news
-------------------------

---------------- Begin Forwarded Message ----------------
Date:        08.03  19:14 Uhr
Received:    09.03  10:31 Uhr
From:        Hope Shand, hope@rafi.org
Reply-To:    post-o-matic@rafi.org
To:          Multiple recipients of, rafi.news@rafi.org



Rural Advancement Foundation International (RAFI)
News Release
7 March 1999
http://www.rafi.org/


	*** Monsanto is Behind Anti-Farmer Legislation to Regulate ***
 			Open-Pollinated Seed Cleaners

	*** Ohio Bill Discriminates Against Seed-Saving Farmers ***



A bill has been introduced in the Ohio state legislature (United States) 
that would require registration and state-level regulation of anyone who 
cleans or conditions self-pollinated seed. According to the Rural 
Advancement Foundation International (RAFI), the proposed legislation is 
part of Monsanto's aggressive corporate strategy to police rural 
communities and intimidate seed-saving farmers.

"The proposed legislation is part of a dangerous trend to eliminate or 
restrict the right of farmers to save and exchange seed - all in the name 
of increasing seed industry profits" explains Hope Shand, Research 
Director of RAFI.  "We weren't surprised to learn that Monsanto is behind 
the bill, because the company is already waging a ferocious campaign 
against seed-saving farmers and it's actively developing the 
controversial suicide seeds - or Terminator technology," said Shand. 
Terminator is a technique for genetically altering a plant so that the 
seeds it produces are sterile. 

According to the Ohio Seed Improvement Association, the proposal to amend 
Ohio's seed law originated with agribusiness giant Monsanto last year. 
Monsanto is the world's largest seller of genetically modified seed. 
Under US patent law it is illegal for farmers to save patented seed. To 
enforce its exclusive monopoly, Monsanto has aggressively prosecuted 
farmers for what the company calls "seed piracy." But seed saving is 
illegal only if the farmer is saving or re-using patented seed. Farmers 
who grow soybeans and wheat, for example, typically save seed from their 
harvest to re-plant the following year. An estimated 25% of North 
American soybean seed is farm-saved seed. 

Monsanto has waged an aggressive, Draconian campaign against seed-saving 
farmers in North America. The company has hired Pinkerton investigators 
to root-out seed-saving farmers and it is using radio ads and telephone 
"tiplines" in farming communities to identify and intimidate farmers who 
might save or re-use the company's patented seed. Under Monsanto's gene 
licensing agreement, the company reserves the right to come onto the 
farmer's land and take seed samples to insure that the farmer is not 
violating patent law.

"It appears that Monsanto's newest strategy is to shift the expense and 
burden of policing rural communities to the seed cleaners and state 
governments. If the bill becomes law, Monsanto's "gene police" will 
ultimately become state regulators who are working on behalf of 
Monsanto," explains Pat Mooney, Executive Director of RAFI. 

 "The Ohio legislation is unfair to farmers because it places an onerous 
regulatory burden on all seed-saving farmers and seed cleaners - not just 
farmers who buy Monsanto's patented seed," explains Shand.  If the bill 
becomes law, it would require seed cleaners to keep detailed records on 
every seed cleaning transaction, to document the name of the farmer, seed 
variety names and whether or not the seed is protected by patents or 
breeders' rights.  "In essence, the bill discriminates against farmers 
who are lawfully saving and re-planting open-pollinated seed varieties," 
asserts RAFI's Shand.

Ohio farmer and custom seed cleaner Roger Peters opposes the proposed 
bill to regulate open-pollinated seed cleaners.  "Why should any farmer 
be forced to keep records on law-abiding farmers who clean their own 
seed?" asks Peters. "And why should public tax dollars be used to protect 
the patents of private seed companies like Monsanto?" questions Peters. 

 "State-level seed laws are supposed to protect farmers, not penalize 
them," asserts Sean McGovern, Executive Administrator of the Ohio 
Ecological Food and Farmers Association, a Columbus, Ohio-based 
organization that promotes sustainable agriculture and certifies organic 
farmers. "I can't imagine any use for this bill accept to enforce 
Monsanto's patents," concludes McGovern.

 


Background information on HB 85, introduced in the Ohio State Legislature 
on January 28, 1999. 

Specifically, H.B. 85, amendments to the Ohio Seed Law would:

- Require all seed cleaners to register as a seed cleaner or conditioner. 
(The bill states that the Director of Agriculture will determine the 
minimum quantity of self-pollinated seed that when cleaned or conditioned 
would require the person to become registered.)

- Require the seed cleaner to keep records on every farmer and seed 
cleaning/conditioning transaction. The seed cleaner would be required to 
keep all records for a minimum of five years and make the records 
available to the State Director of Agriculture on request.

- The seed cleaner would be required to document the following 
information:

1. The commonly accepted name and brand or variety being cleaned;
2. A declaration of any patent, or plant variety protection certificate, 
issued for the seed being cleaned or conditioned;
3. The name, address, telephone number of the farmer who submitted the 
seed to be cleaned or conditioned; the amount of seed cleaned or 
conditioned; and an indemnification statement signed by the person who 
submitted the seed for cleaning:

"The undersigned promises to reimburse or indemnify the seed cleaner or 
conditioner for any liability damages that the seed cleaner or 
conditioner may incur for any violation of a patent or a certificate 
issued under the Plant Variety Protection Act resulting from cleaning or 
conditioning the undersigned's seed, including all damages, liability 
payments, costs, and attorney's fees arising in connection with the 
violation."

- The seed cleaner or conditioner is required to retain a sample of each 
type and variety or brand of seed cleaned or conditioned for at least 18 
months.

- The Director of Agriculture may inspect all records, documents and 
samples required to be kept by the seed cleaner /conditioner to determine 
if he/she is in compliance with the law. If the Director suspects that a 
registered seed cleaner or conditioner has violated or is violating a 
provision - the director shall conduct a hearing, and may suspend, 
revoke, or refuse to renew the person's registration. 




For more information, contact:

Hope Shand, Rural Advancement Foundation International
Tel: 717 337-6482
Email: hope@rafi.org

Pat Mooney, Rural Advancement Foundation International
Tel: 204 453-5259
Email: rafi@rafi.org

Roger L. Peters, Farmer
Oak Harbor, Ohio
Tel: 419 898-1210


RAFI (The Rural Advancement Foundation International) is an international 
civil society organization head-quartered in Canada.  RAFI is dedicated 
to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, and to the 
socially responsible development of technologies useful to rural 
societies.  RAFI is concerned about the loss of agricultural 
biodiversity, and the impact of intellectual property on farmers and food 
security.
 

----------------- End Forwarded Message -----------------

===================================================
-| Hartmut Meyer
-| Co-ordinator
-| GENET
-| The European NGO Network on Genetic Engineering
-|
-| Reinhaeuser Landstr. 51
-| D - 37083 Goettingen
-| Germany
-| 
-| phone: #49-551-7700027
-| fax  : #49-551-7701672
-| email: genet@agoranet.be
===================================================

Genet News
---------